You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘Spiritual Care’ category.

The liberal left can be as rigid and destructive as any force in American life.

Daniel Patrick Moynihan

+ + +

Pat Moynihan was a good and honest man.  Grew up in Hell’s Kitchen.  Became a Harvard prof.  A Democrat.  An intellectual.  A public servant.  A man who loved his country and maintained an informed and honest conversation with all members of the political community and the public at large.

He was a man without malice, an open-minded man who let the evidence lead him to conclusions.  He was neither an ideologue nor a rigid partisan.  He was a public servant – an honest man.  In his day, this country and its people came before political party.

Today’s Democrat Party is not Pat Moynihan’s Party.  Likewise, he would not recognize the present U.S. Department of Justice or the F.B.I. as places of honor and honesty and he would speak about its failure and, with urgency, seek to correct its shameful ways.

We are in a bad way today.  We are losing the legacy of a loyal and fair opposition – the Democrat Party.   They no longer maintain an interest in governing in the Congress.  They simply “resist.”  In this failure to legislate, the process which connects each of us to the liberty embodied in the U.S. Constitution, injuries each of us and makes a sham of election to the Congress.

As a political entity the Democrats now lean to socialism and further Left even.  Its views and actions resonate as nihilism; in voice and deed they show contempt for our Republic, the Nation itself, law and our Constitution.  They have become a party of unequal justice, disdain for the common citizen, and hatred of those with whom they disagree.  Sadly, the lawlessness of their members, sympathizers, friends and associates are often excused.

This is not Pat Moynihan’s Democrat Party – and we are far the lesser for it.

The Lord is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear?  The Lord is the defense of my life.  Whom shall I dread?

Our salvation, and the preservation of this Nation, will rest on our relationship with God – the source of our sovereignty and our salvation.

Shalom.

Good Men – The Democrat Party I knew once had great, good men in it.  Men like Tip O’Neill (U.S. Congressman and Speaker of the House) and Barefoot Sanders (a Federal Judge and former U.S. Senate candidate from Texas).  Each was a fine person, honest and fair.  Each enjoyed people – valued them.  The Democrat Party is a long way from these men of character.  Wish it was not so.

Advertisements

… the chief priests and the Pharisees convened a council, and were saying, “What are we doing?  For this man is preforming many signs.  If we let Him go on like this, all men will believe in Him and the Romans will come and take away our place and our nation.”

Jn 11:47

+ + +

Power is intoxicating and easily so.  Herein, we see the chief priests and Pharisees gathering after Jesus calls Lazarus back to life.  Their thoughts?  How can we preserve our status?  

Is this not the way of the “powerful” and the privileged?  Is this not a truth that conveys over all time?  Those at “the top” of the ladder want to remain at the top of the ladder.

Such a disposition turns one’s back on God.  ‘Tis the way of political people, the self-important, far too often.

Oddly, the strongest among us are not those at “the top,” but those who are humble and guided by faith, knowing full well there is a God and they are not God.  In their mortal existence the strongest are immortal by choice, by faith, by belief.

It is an old story – one we prefer to neglect.  Offered a Messiah, we guard our vaunted place in the pecking order.  This is tedious to those who know and believe.  Tedious indeed!  Why concede the tedious ones a grant of authority?  Would you not prefer those who welcome the Messiah be those who lead?  Are they not the wiser?  Braver?

Where are you on such things?

Shalom.

 

Jesus said … “Did I not say that if you believe, you will see the glory of God.”

Jn 11:39

+ + +

Here Jesus speaks to Martha, the sister of Lazarus, after Lazarus has died and been laid to rest in his tomb.

You see those who assembled around Martha and her sister Mary questioned why Jesus (who had opened the eyes of the blind man) did not keep their friend Lazarus from death.

We live in a period where “unbelief” is widespread and where, absent believe, individuals and groups attempt to secure their ends sans faith and God.

In a milder form this was the sentiment of those who doubted Jesus was the Messiah … and began to question His identity at Lazarus’ death.  These people favored their desired outcome, and doubted Jesus.  We do precisely this today.  We are of little faith.  We “go it alone” and seek our fractured ends.  Godless we create a mess, elevate ourselves to heights of foolishness and descend to the depths of chaos, uncertainty, hostility, destruction, dishonesty and folly.  Without belief – we destroy the gifts we have been given.  Shame on us.

We had best learn the lesson of Lazarus’ death.  Living in doubt of God – we have done great damage.  Shame on us.

Stay strong in faith.  Turn from those who, not believing, destroy.

Shalom.

Yesterday’s Congressional Hearing – Witness Peter Strzok of the FBI and the howling Members of the Congress in the minority party showed what godlessness looks like – what life without belief sounds like.  Poor Mr. Strzok – smug, self-righteous.  Members of the minority – chaotic, even childish.  Net: dignity absent – humility, maturity and belief in short supply. 

… we seek nothing but the particular place willed for us by God …

Then we discover what the spiritual life really is … It is the silence of our whole being in compunction and adoration before God, in the habitual realization that He is everything and we are nothing, that He is the Center to which all things tend, and to Whom all our actions are directed.  That our life and strength proceed from Him, that both in life and death we depend entirely on Him, that the whole course of our life is foreknown by Him and falls into the plan of His wise and merciful Providence; that it is absurd to live without Him, for ourselves, by ourselves … and in the end the only thing that matters is His glory.

Thomas Merton, in Thoughts in Solitude

+ + +

In the Mass readings today we hear God lamenting that His children have moved away from Him and we hear Jesus advise us to move away from those who do not receive or listen to his words.

Our dilemma is that we live in an age where many of the most public and most vocal have moved away from God and do not listen to the words of His Son.  Likewise the culture in its digital discourse and mass communication is crowded with those who operate largely by themselves – without reference to God.  Indeed, that is the bulk of present day discourse and we are obviously affected negatively by this.

What is one to do in such circumstances?

Yes, we are assured in the Old Testament reading of today (from Hosanna) that God will act mercifully as to those who rebel.  And, we know that Jesus in today’s Gospel (from Matthew) would have us separate from those who do not receive his words or listen to him.  So we have a plan: be merciful, yet separate from those who reject the Savior’s words.

But how is this to be done?

Merton offers a way: seeking time in silence and the company of God in that silence.  For in that silence the primacy of God is known and experienced and we are in the form that we are designed to know and in which we will find peace when all about are in discord and distress.

Yes, our confidence is in God and our task is to stand apart form those who reject God outright, and in their rejection of the Son, reject the Father.  Our remedy for this is silence – a singular silence where God is heard – much as the Son shows us in his regular retreats to the quiet of the desert.

In silence we can find stability, meaning and fulfillment.

Shalom.      

 

The transformation of charity into legal entitlement has produced both donors without love and recipients without gratitude.

Antonin Scalia

+ + +

These words are from an address given by former Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia at the Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome in 1996.

Among his observations are these:

  • “a Christian should not support a government that suppresses faith or one that sanctions the taking of innocent life”
  • he knows of “no country in which the churches have grown fuller as the government has moved leftward”
  • the most religious nation in the West (the U.S.) is a capitalist society that is “least diluted by socialism”  (Emphasis added.)
  • since FDR’s New Deal, the U.S. has taken on the increasing role of a welfare state (i.e., taking tax proceeds of all and dispensing them to select individuals and groups that are deemed “needy” – and building political constituents in the process)
  • “Christ’s view was that you should give your goods to the poor, not that you should force someone else to give his (to others)”  (Emphasis added.)
  • “to the extent that the states takes upon itself one of the corporal works of mercy that would have been undertaken privately, it deprives individuals of an opportunity for sanctification and deprives the body of Christ of the occasion for interchange of love among its members”
  • the welfare-state does not contain or convey the Christian virtue of altruism
  • “governmentalization of charity effects … the donor but also the recipient … What was once asked as a favor is now demanded as an entitlement … the teaching of welfare socialism is that the world owes everyone a living.”

What Scalia lays out is the decline of the role of faith in secular culture – and with it the loss of moral conduct long displayed by acts of religiously inspired service.

Likewise socialism fundamentally changes the way humans experience themselves, others and the nature of fellowship and community – indeed it blunts the power of love and hope … it deprives us of faith and sanctification.

Make no mistake, religion and God have been shunned in the post-New Deal environment – and, frankly, when moral conduct is not fostered through a population who has an active faith – hostility and faithless division takes its place.  There we become a troubled and self-destructive culture with less opportunity to make of us brothers and sisters to one another.

Converting to socialism and BIG government is, quite simply, destructive.

Shalom.

It is very well to insist that man is a “social animal” – the fact is obvious enough.  But there is no justification for making him a mere cog in a totalitarian machine –  

In actual fact, society depends for its existence on the inviolable personal solitude of its members.  Society, to merit its name, must be made up not of numbers, or mechanical units, but of persons.  To be a person implies responsibility and freedom, and both of these imply a certain interior solitude, a sense of personal integrity  … (Emphasis added.)

Thomas Merton, in Thoughts in Solitude

+ + +

Well, we are about to have a real brou-ha-ha over the appointment of a new Justice to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The President has nominated a person whose view seems to be that the U.S. Constitution, as written, must be honored – that it is not a judge’s job to “make” new law but rather honor the plain meaning of the Constitution as written.

This view is opposed by the Left. They prefer (and have become accustomed to) winning political objectives through law suits and Court action when they cannot secure these objectives through the legislature or through the political (electoral) process.

This brings us to Merton.

He notes that we have arrived at a point in time whereby the individual can be made into a “cog in a totalitarian machine.”  Indeed, this is the risk one runs when a group desires that their views and preferences be imposed on others, especially in areas that are deeply personal and about which reasonable people can differ.

The point Merton makes is that society is composed of free people who take individual responsibility for their own life.

This is the underpinning of our rights and protections in our Constitution.  This is the root of a free representative Republic.  This is the articulated view of the current nominee to the Supreme Court.  His emphasis is on protecting the sanctity of the individual and the Constitution.  In a very real sense that is the underlying dispute between Conservatives, moderates and “neutralists,” and the Left today.

One sees in the opposition to this nominee and his way of seeing and understanding the Left is worried.  Their concern is that his way of thinking will result in the abandoned of their preferences in matters of social policy secured through Judicial activism.

I do not know how this will sort itself out – but I do know that (for me) I am tired of waking up every day to the non-stop yelling and screaming, hyperbolic assertions of the Left and the endless “demonstrations” that manufacture and perpetuate discord.  Likewise, I do not see the judicial system as a means to create social (or public) policy – a task resting with the Legisature.

I prefer quieter times, a Court that protects the Constitution, and the baseline expectation that each free person will be individually responsibility for their own life.

I favor the sacred person to a “cog.”  I find the former is a more satisfying and liberating state of being than the latter.

Shalom.

 

 

All sins are attempts to fill voids.

Simone Weil

+ + +

Life isn’t hard if you just listen to people who are smart and leave us some valuable guideposts.  Of course as people – we tend to charge ahead hitting objects head-first without a helmet.

And, then – there are things that find us – hardships, inconveniences, bad deeds and thoughtless things done by others others.  These produce the occasion to sin – to react harshly and “get even.”  But the greatest frontier as to sin – is us, each of us.

We are sinners.  Every one of us.  (That’s why God and mercy are so necessary to our existence, our over-arching story.)

Think about this: when you sin, ask yourself what void has this sinful act uncovered in me? 

Many of the sins we see are “deficits” we experience related to the want of intimacy, or power, or status, or identity, or a place in the group or the world.  Once you discover this, sin can be defused – and then, all the more, when you realize God is vital to your full grow and development – your contentment, peace and relationship with others comes into full form.

The more sin is defuse – the more others become your brothers and sisters.  That joy awaits you.  God speed.

Shalom.

 

… the Lord spoke to me, the Spirit entered into me and set me on my feet …

Ez 2:2

+ + +

In this Old Testament verse, the Prophet Ezekiel records how he was moved to assume responsibility to go to the Israelites who had consistently rebelled against their God.

Think about Ezekiel.  He was a faithful man and in his relationship with God he was moved to address the waywardness of his fellow Jews.  In this he accepted a difficult course – that of a Prophet.  He was willing to speak God’s truth to those who had strayed from that truth – from their God.

Is there not always a place for Prophets?

Are we ourselves not often in rebellion as to God?  Do we not prefer our desires to God’s intention for us?  Do we not place politics above faith?  Ideology above belief?  Are we not today the Israelies of yesterday?

Are we, as Believers, not called as Ezekiel was called?  If not you, then who?  Who might speak God’s truth to those who demonstrate they rebell and corrupt what is good?  Is our silence ever justified in such circumstances?  What if Eekiel remained silent?

Someone must speak God’s truth.  Today requires more than one voice speaking God’s truth.  A Nation of professed belief in God requires the voices of those who believe.

Shalom.

the righteous mind is like a tongue with six taster receptors.  Secular Western moralities are like cuisines that try to activate just one or two of these receptors – either concerns about harm and suffering, or concerns about fairness and injustice.  But people have so many powerful moral intuitions, such as those related to liberty, loyalty, authority, and sanctity.  (Emphasis added.)

Jonathan Haidt, Ph.D., in The Righteous Mind

+ + +

Well if you want to understand the basic rift between the Left and others (moderates, Conservatives, and “neutralists”)?  Haidt gives you that understanding.

The Left is secularized – removed from faith, anchored in material existence, the narrows of intellect and ideology devoid of psychological or spiritual depth and the understanding and experience that each provides.

In matters public and political they are so narrowly focused, they neglect or dismiss our natural desire for liberty, loyalty, authority and sanctity (as Haidt notes).

You see, esteemed Social Psychologist Haidt is telling us that as a matter of innate design the human person thirsts for morality that attends to more than fairness and equality.  Mind you, this thirst is an involuntary desire.  Hence, we are “hardwired” for a morality that extends beyond the shallows of the Left.

The distinction that Haidt describes explains why the Left is intolerant and must force their views on others much as totalitarians do.

Ironically, on an even playing field (i.e., one not corrupted to protect their views) the Left is destined to fail because the public’s natural moral appetite is larger than what they offer.  Humans are more complex than the Left reckons.  No, we are not all like them or their ideology.

Think about the many positions the Left advances or defends and you realize that their positions are at odds with the innate moral desires of the human person at-large.

Once that thinking is done, you can see how the Left forestalls the full development of the human person.  Indeed, they create unnecessary conflict (and division) by attempting to impose exceedingly narrow views on others that are, as a consequence, antagonistic to our broader moral needs.

Haidt, applied to our present situation, leads to greater understanding of the unhealthy antagonism that the Left generates.

You would be wise to get to know Haidt and his excellent scholarly work.

Shalom.

 

July 6th, 2018 – Hope it is a good one for you!

# # #

If you want something too much it’s likely to be a disappointment.  The healthy way is to learn to like the everyday things, like soft beds and buttermilk – and feisty gentlemen.

Larry McMurtry, in Lonesome Dove

+ + +

Re-reading a favorite book or watching a movie you have already seen can restore a perspective you once possessed and need to acquire again.  Yes, the pace of present day secular culture occupies us so thoroughly that we can easily lose our orientation, perspective, way of being when we are at our most relaxed best.

The above words are those of Gus McCrae, a crusty old witty and practical ex-Texas Ranger with a philosopher’s disposition and a desert dry sense of humor.

Old Gus proceeded through life with joy.  He never missed the fun, nor fooled himself as to the world he lived in, the nature of people in it, or himself.  He was hassle-free.  I do not mean problem-free – for the world is the world even for honest and balanced characters in Western novels.

Seeing Gus’s humor and wisdom, sense of justice and courage, fidelity to friends and principles reminds me of how not like Gus so many people are now.  The contrast is striking.  Gus stood tall – saw what was before him and never shunned the call to honor.

Unlike many with public voice today, Gus was not a complainer – not a whiner, and in contrast to the multitude of Left and liberal voices we hear – he was not sour, frantic, perpetually irritated, obnoxious, and demanding.

Gus had fun with life – the Left and the liberals do not.  The Left today is disgruntled or angry about anything and everything that is not what they want, do, think, believe, expect, or demand.

Mind you, Gus’s life on the Western frontier in the late 19th century was hard and unpredictable.  But Old Gus took all the hurdles, bumps, twists and turns with same panache that Sinatra sang – smoothly and self-assuredly while resigned to the magistry and mystery of it all.

How we’d help ourselves to be like Gus: funny, witty, courageous, sober, loyal, grateful, clever, loving, generous, and wise.

Right now, those most vocal among us are anxious or offended, or hostile, or loud and unhappy – unpleasant and constantly frantic.  No Gus for them.  Unlike Gus – they take nothing in stride.

Life in the West in the late 19th century, or life today in cyber-secularism?  Where’s my horse and gun?

Shalom.

Welcome Message

Categories

Log In

Advertisements
%d bloggers like this: