You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘Lust for Power’ category.

… those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and those who humble themselves will be exalted.

Mt 23:20

+ + +

Make no mistake there are distinct, substantive differences between our two major parties.

Do not be deceived the last electoral result highlighted the very real difference between the common citizen and the elites: those with power, money, status – the intellectual and celebrity class, globalists, the media, the perpetual Washington insiders whose class status is far different from Mom and Dad in small town U.S.A. , and between the ideologues, “special pleaders,” and mere citizen taxpayers.

Frankly, the privileged class lost and the most politically-focused of them (the Left and the Washington wags who are used to being “important”) are offended and not taking their bite of humble pie very well.  Yes, their obstruction and rhetoric is destructive – having gone beyond civil debate.  Actually, their behavior mimics the Democrats in the Wisconsin legislature who fled their state and hid from their official duties so as to thwart the election of Republican Governor Scott Walker.

Like all actions people take, the angry objection to the voters choice of President tells us about those who are upset.  One thing it says is this: politics and power is a high priority for them – probably too important for their and our wellbeing as a nation.  Make no mistake a subset is NOT greater than the whole.  No one is more important than the nation.

It is always hard to speak to your Brother and Sister when they must be reproached – but speak we must – speak calmly, in a soft voice, as a friend, with authority and care. Reconciliation is the goal and it must always be.

Losses are difficult for many.  Those of us who have lived modestly and, in my case, on the “wrong side of the tracks” amid the very serious conflicts one can encounter – we are used to life’s ups and downs.  We learned long ago that no one wins all the time and that it is the losses which actually teach us the best lessons, impart the greatest truth and wisdom.

The one thing that we need now is a calm conversation with those who are most displaced by their perceived loss.  For civility to return, maturity must be cultivated and in this instance it means those hurt must listen to the voices of those who care for their welfare and that of this nation.  Yelling, fighting, anger will only inflame and put much at risk … including each of us.

Remember the opposite of love is not hate – but rather: indifference.  We cannot afford to draw battle lines, engage in nasty and dishonest behavior, retribution, character assassination, or violence.   Honest, calm conversation is the need.  An end to extreme language that excites ideologues and flames the fire … it must cease today, now.

I hope we are all to the task.  It is the humble who are exalted.  They are strongest who life has humbled.  Make no mistake – in the end the humble remain standing while the prideful fall. 

Shalom.

Postscript – I am always amazed that the “talking heads” on T.V. and many elected officials talk and talk without ever citing an authority – the words of someone whose insight and wisdom they share.  You have to conclude that they are talking through their hats, haven’t cracked a book since the 3rd grade.

You wonder: why would I listen to these people?  They really do not warrant my time.  They do not.  Happy landings.

The text has disappeared under the interpretation.

Friedrich Nietzsche, in Beyond Good and Evil

+ + +

In America today we do a very poor job attending to the problems we face.  The principle mistake: we fail to determine the source of the problem.

We are most frequently trapped by the parameters of the problem itself, as it appears on the surface to us.  We let the problem define us.  We have lost touch with our text.

Yes, all problems tell us of the human person, his and her propensities, limitations, recurrent mistakes and failures.  Yet, in losing text, we lose context. Context lost, we fumble around making all sorts of mistakes and enemies while sustaining the presence of the problem, even institutionalizing it so that it becomes a permanent (but utterly unnecessary) presence in our life and culture. (Think how accommodations to race institutionalize racism.)

I give you an example.  Thinking about “activism” today, one might ask why so much of this?  Why do women assemble dressed as “vaginas” and with “pink pussy hats” to air their grievances?  Why do disgruntled Blacks burn down their neighborhoods, or Leftist and anarchists dress in black, wear masts, assemble to destroy private property, set fires, throw rocks at others?

We rarely ask: where does this come from?

In reading about Catholic monk Thomas Merton’s admiration for writer Albert Camus, I saw something of the origin of the activism we witness today. Indeed, I see the grand fallacy of social activism as it appears today … and yes, I see text lost to poorly formed interpretation.

Merton (like many liberals) admired French intellectuals who thought that it was an intellectual’s duty to be politically engaged.  In Camus, Merton saw an intellectual who did so.  He was smitten.

Camus, like his Leftist colleagues, saw the tension between a belief in things transcendent and evil.  Being without faith, Camus mistakenly dismissed God altogether.  His faulty reasoning: a good God would not allow evil to exist.  He failed to understand this basic proposition: God is perfect Good and as such not evil, yet God made the human being as an imperfect image of the Divine and it is man, not God, who besmirchs good with less good or evil.  In the godless Camus, the text is lost: it is NOT God but man who authors evil.

So Camus’ activism and today’s activism is imperfect man acting without God (without text and context) and producing evil when good is desired.  This the grand mistake of social activism.  We do not, as mere humans, possess the capacity to produce perfection – a world that is without evil.

All godless activism leads to politics and power and these divide, foster hostility – particularly when ideology replaces a more learned view of human existence.

Yes, there is an enormous price paid for text lost.

So we have now, real division – social activists who hate others and this nation. ‘Tis a very sorry state – one that may well destroy us.

Think about the lost text.  Christ was not a social activist.  He did not revolt.  He sustained in the midst of evil.   He was the willing, innocent victim of political power.  He suffered and died to glorify God and the truth man and of the Judeo-Christian story.

Truth and perfection does not come from man, nor in mortal life.  The truth of the matter is that we live for what is transcendent.  Camus, French intellectuals, Merton and the activists have it exactly wrong.  Christ does not.

Shalom.

 

 

Now the Lord said to Abram, “Go forth from your country … To the land that I will show you; and I will make of you a great nation … And in you all the families of the earth will be blessed.”

Gen 12: 1, 2, 3

+ + +

I sit in the morning fog in God’s green land.  Behind the mist are the pastures and the hills and mountains that I am sure to see when the veil is lifted and the sky is opened. I listen to De Profundis and Palestrina’s Gloria from Missa Papae Marcelli.

The news of the world is troubling.  In this land we wake to stories of overdoses, and of the murder of two young Muslim teenage boys on the eve of their high school graduation, both honor students on their way to college, and of conflicts and hostilities in Asia, the Middle East, Europe and Africa.  In our legislature the Party out of power acts like spoiled children, turns to obstruction while problems pile up and division disheartens.  Small groups act like angry pagans demanding this or that.  Racism surfaces among those once its victim.  The morning fog cannot hide the shame of this.

It had been four centuries without a prophet until Jesus emerged.  Four centuries.  Our Jewish brothers and sisters wondered why God was silent.  Then we received The Word, Immanuel – “God with us.”

We have been given the opportunity to become the children of God, to become the great nation that Abraham was called to bring forth.

Children of God and children of Abraham, but how do we act today?  We act as if there was no Abraham, no Jesus and there is no God.

Today we seek to create good through human acts but in place of good is conflict, discontent, selfishness, hatred.  The flesh and the will of man cannot triumph … it is God who perfects man, not man who prefects man.  Like Abraham we must be His vehicle, His instrument.

Like you I see the conflict, the needless hurt, the arrogance of man and woman, the reliance on self as if we are God.  We have credited ourselves with wisdom and power we do not have.

The good and wise man is humble, speaks softly – sees others as his family.

Are you the good and wise man?  Am I?

Shalom.

 

 

Not that one … (was) … evil.  But that millions had not the courage to be good.

John Fowles, in The Magus

+ + +

Seventy-three years ago today, America’s young men landed on the beaches of Normandy, France, knowing full well two things: (1) they risked their lives, (2) their country and the world needed them to defeat Germany and bring peace to Europe.

On this anniversary of the Normandy invasion a 25-year-old masculine-looking young woman, a twit, a Leftie – a Bernie Sanders supporter and Trumphater, has been arrested by the F.B.I. and is reported to have admitted to them that she took classified documents from the National Security Agency and sent them to a discredited Leftist organization whose mission it has been to interfere with America’s national security efforts.

Dandy.  In the 73 years since one of our greatest hours, we have produced gender-confused, ignorant, self-centered children whose Leftist ideology and personal fetishes seem to justify an arrogance that jeopardizes the lives of 300 million Americans, this country and Western Civilization.  In this we are way beyond pride – we are into real hate-filled pathology .. and this young woman is only one of many.

How did we get here?

Well it is probably hard to say definitively but one critical factor is that the Democrat Party has moved far to the Left and this has resulted in ideology supplanting pragmatism and patriotism.

The root of that Leftist ideology is, of course, Marxism which sees perpetual conflict between groups and fosters and sustains hostility which breaks down nation, national identity and community and furthers totalitarianism.  (It is any wonder that the Left has no regard for national borders?)  

The Democrat Party of 2017 is focused on one thing: power.  They seek it through the growth and control of an ever-expanding federal government, the implementation of laws, regulations, programs and policies that seek conception-to-grave domination of all aspects of human existence.

Make no mistake, Ms. Self-Righteous Leaker is a product of this ideology which is, by the way, the preoccupation of American education – pre-school through college.

Yes, the Democrat Left indoctrinates.  Education produces sycophants, followers. The media provides daily instruction.  The herd follows lemming-like.  Betrayal results.

If you doubt the seriousness of this – just look at the Congressional Democrats, and Leftist press and media, college professors and “special pleaders” who viciously attack the Presidency – and in so doing undermine the legitimacy of the Office.

Look at how they obstruct legislative business in the Congress (thank you, Charles Schumer, disciple of Harry Reid).  With them, do nothing matches know-nothing.  Their mantra? Better selfishness than service!

Look at the political use of government agencies and a judiciary of ideologues.

Look at how lies dominate Benghazi and other sad failures.  Look at their last presidential candidate and her inability to admit her own failure.  Look at prominent Democrats embracing “resistance” to President Trump and national government.

By the way, make no mistake opposition to President Trump is opposition to all who voted for him.  Know this with absolute certainty: the Democrats don’t just believe those who disagree with them are wrong, no – they think those who disagree with them are deplorables – irredeemable.

From D-Day to Leak Day.  Some fall from grace.

Shalom.

Comey Testimony – If there is one thing you need to know about government it is this: only in government and education can you rise so easily above your level of competence and eventually command a country’s attention.  This is just more proof that government is best when it is small and education is badly overrated.

… in every society where the distinction of ranks has once been completely established, there have been always two different … systems of morality current at the same time; … one may be called the strict … the other the liberal, or … the loose system.  The former admired and revered by the common people, the latter … by … people of fashion.  (Emphasis added.)

Adam Smith, in The Wealth of Nations

+ + +

This is Smith writing in 1776.  His book had a huge impact.  Its date coincided with the founding of the United States.

What Smith said then is as useful now as it has been over the last 241 years. Smith knew people.  He knew power, and he knew politics.

What he said then is visible to us today.

We have groomed a collection of elites.  These are the privileged people – the super-rich and the very affluent.  We see them in national politics, among ex-Presidents, on the bench, in the media, in entertainment, among those newly wealthy in the computer and internet industry, within the highly-educated class and in the tenured positions at once prestigious colleges.

These are people who live well above the income level of the common person – their morals are not the morals of common people.  Regrettably their privileged lives convince them that they know better than the commoners and that this licenses them to enforce their morals (such as they are) on the rest of us … along with their public policies.

Ah, but their interests are not our interests.  They do not suffer when factory jobs disappear and when small towns no longer present a place to work and raise a family free of addictions, dependency and hopelessness.

This privileged class manifests less need for faith than the commoner.  Hence, their morals are unlike the commoner.  Surely not better, but rather uniquely destructive, divisive and unhealthy.

As Adams says so well, the morals of the privileged are ruinous …  and because they are wealthy, the elites can sustain years of disorder far longer than the commoner.

That said, when a nation loses its identity to illegal invaders, when abortion is a form of “birth control,” and the spread of terrorism takes the life of innocents, of children and unarmed men and women – the time for the loose morals and destructive policies and preferences of elites comes to an end.  THIS IS BRIXET AND THE HILLARY CLINTON AND DEMOCRATIC DEFEAT AT THE POLLS.  This is how one explains that the Democrats captured only 64 of the over 3000 counties in the U.S. in the last presidential election.

The heinous photo of a minor female “entertainer” holding the severed head of President Trump tells you three important things: one, the morals of the privileged are not the morals of the common person; two, the curve is bending back on the Liberals (the privileged class in both political parties) and their attitudes and disposition; and three, the relentless attacks on the President are the elites clutching at control, attempting to retain power at all costs … power over the common person.

Ah, but the times may well be changing.

Shalom.

We see the world … as we are …

Stephen R. Covey

+ + +

These seven words are worth remembering.  There is truth in them.  Our actions, inactions, thoughts and concerns tell others who we are.

Thinking about this I am struck by two things: (1) how often we meet or are exposed to difficult or disordered people in this culture, (2) how often we can conclude that those we encounter have defaulted to a status far below their full growth and development.

This brings me to Carl Jung, M.D., and this opinion: we do little or nothing to present people with an understanding of what a human being is, and how we are formed and develop.

Jung’s life work provides a useful template which we neglect at great expense.

His view was that each person had to develop as the individual person they were created to be (i.e., individuation).  To explain this process, Dr. Jung focused first on the psyche.  

Jung divided the mind into a conscious and unconscious sphere.  The latter is divided into two components: what is personal and what is collective.  The personal is composed of lifetime experiences – including things forgotten or repressed.  The unconscious is comprised of universal and timeless images and understandings that are “inherited” and formed in archetypal patterns the denial of which creates disorder, keeps one from full development and individuation.

Jung’s view is that when one attends to the conscious (the center of which is the ego) and neglects the unconscious imbalance follows, and reaction appears in dreams, dream images and fantasies intended to encourage the full experience of human life.   Those who repress or neglect the unconscious sphere rely on ego alone and their assertiveness and disposition can be punishing to themselves and others upon whom they impose their will.  Yes, rely on ego and consciousness alone and disorder arises.

The latter, those egotists who impose their will, are abundant in politics and mass media today – giving rise to the hostility, bias and rather zany and self-destructive ideas advocated by the Left and ideologues today.

The practical point to be made is this: when you encounter those who advance strange ideas and insist on your allegiance to them, and turn hostile when you pause or refute their views you are likely facing one who is imbalanced.  One who does not manifest a healthy humility, is frantic when there is no reason for such a state – is probably short of the development they can, if the wish, achieve.

When you look about, when you encounter people and groups who are insistent and aggressive, who demonize those who do not agree with them – you are wise to discount their views.  Their behavior itself discredits what they advocate or propose.

Shalom.

Amazing – It is amazing to listen to the “Priests of Climate Change” who see those who disagree with them as heretics … and use scathing words to show their discontent.  So much for tolerance, civility and a democracy that allows for difference of opinion.

 

Excarnation … the process by which religion is dis-embodied and de-ritualized.

James. K.A. Smith, in How (Not) to Be Secular

+ + +

The challenge we face in America and the West is excarnation.  The question posed: will we believe or will we not?

Failing to believe in God, we shall all the same rely on something to anchor us. That something might be our gender, or our sexual behavior, an ideology, our self to the exclusion of all others, or nothing at all …

Yesterday, little was said by American mass media of the killing of a bus load of Egyptian Coptic Christian mothers and children on their way to a monastic retreat. Why, you might ask?

The answer is really quite simple – those who govern media are excarnated.  They do not believe.  Religion does not matter to them … or to the Democrat and “progressive” Left politicians, by the way.  It is worth noting that Senator Schumer did not pop up on T.V. to rant about the killing of these innocent, unarmed believers.  Granny Pelosi was absent, too.  No surprise really. Remember, candidate Obama referred to believers as those who cling to the guns and the Bible … and Hillary thinks of believers as “unredeemable.”

The Left does not hide its hostility, nor its ignorance.

If you want to know what is at the core of the hatred of Donald Trump – it is not Trump himself but those who voted for him and their beliefs.  Religious belief is an obstacle to the pagan practices and policies of the Left.  The core of today’s problem in our nation and the West centers on belief.  

Incarnation or excarnation?

Shalom.

Remarkable Reception for President Trump in Saudi Arabia.  The Saudis are to be applauded for the warmth and dignity they display.  This could be a significant turning point.  So much for the notion that President Trump is the Devil incarnate.

# # # 

… the state threatened to become not only militarily and politically triumphant but psychologically so: the custodial Superego for millions … their Egos an instrument, pure and simple, of the state’s bureaucratic manipulation.

Robert Coles, M.D. in A Secular Mind

+ + +

Dr. Coles, an esteemed research psychiatrist, is commenting on Nobel Laureate Czeslaw Milosz’s observations in his book entitled A Captive Mind in which he explores the consequences of (Communist) centralized state power over the individual person.

Doctor Coles ends his book about the secularized mind by focusing on the apparent need for the modern state to secure social and psychological control over its population.  And, Coles focuses on the prospects of neurochemistry and medical science in doing so.

As to the latter point, Coles draws on advances in neuroscience, biology and medicine – particularly on developments in pharmacology – reminding us that Sigmund Freud thought that in time the mind itself might be reduced to simple matter and ministered to (and perhaps altered substantially) by medications. That is to say, that the experience of being human would change rather significantly.

This, by the way, has been a theme expressed over time by a number of people from Orwell, to Huxley, to Stanislaw Witkiewicz and others, and displayed in Phillip Dick’s 1968 movie Blade Runner.

The notion of centralized control over the person leads me to think more critically of the divisions between those who despise Donald Trump and those who voted for him.

In thinking about this I see Trump as an unimportant focus.  It is not he himself that matters but rather the significance of the divide between those who voted for him and those who are clearly threatened by him, and seem to hate him.

It seems to me that the divide is what is important.

That said, I think one can make a reasonable observation that the difference is in part the distinction between those who favor centralized power and those who do not.  In effect, we are talking about those who favor government control over the social and psychological nature of the human person and those who oppose the same.

Illustratively, the Left favors imposing their “views” on others – i.e., forced “tolerance.” Some in the middle ground default to continued growth in government to the extent that sovereignty and national identity and nation itself is devolved to international organizations and competing cultures (i.e., globalists).

In opposition to this, of course, are those who favor less government and preservation of nation, individual freedom and continued American economic prosperity and ethos, and constitutional Federalism.

We have simply stated: globalists vs. nationalists.

So the question today is not Trump but what underpins the divide?  Why his adversaries violently oppose him?  Why the hatred and effort to drive him from office?

My view is that it has to do with a very fundamental question: Will we live in a country where control over the human person expands as the power of the central government and international organizations expands or will we not?

Shalom.

The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself, without regard to any prevailing superstitions and taboos.

H.L. Mencken, in A Mencken Chrestomathy

+ + +

I have been interested in government and politics since I was a youngster in Boston.  I majored in government as an undergraduate, after law school and service in the military (U.S. Army officer), I studied American foreign policy at The Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies in Washington, D.C. and have worked in both the U.S. Senate and the U.S. House of Representatives, in a Washington law firm and as a trial and appellate lawyer in private practice in the Nation’s Capital.

All tolled, I spent over thirty years in Washington and have been following national government, politics and public policy for 60 years.  That said, I have never seen any President relentlessly attacked as Donald Trump is being attacked.  And I mean attacked by newspapers with story after story stocked with “unnamed sources” and repeated by media lightweights as if such “unnamed sources:” (a) exist, and (b) are truthful, accurate, without bias or personal objective if they do exist.

On first blush this is remarkable, astonishing and difficult to understand … until you consider H.L. Mencken’s astute and timelessly true observation, to wit: the governing class hates anyone who appears on their doorstep and does not kowtow to them and the prevailing genius they claim exclusively for themselves.  

This more than any other thing is the controlling proposition that explains why the Democrats, the Left, the political press, television “talking heads,” assembled “D.C. special pleaders” (who fancy themselves an essential part of the “importance” of government and public policy), the globalists, elite Republicans, etc. despise President Trump and those who elected him.

Yes, you are correct: “the governing class” is immune from any notion that we are a nation “by the people,” and “for the people.”  This class, you see, views themselves as “special” – better than the populace and the voting public.

Make no mistake in hating Trump, the governing class disdains those who voted for him and anyone who dares to disagree with them or disturb their peace.

Lest, you think this is hard to believe – I offer one wonderful account from history.

When Ronald Reagan was newly elected, an old Washington “hand” – the Patrician lawyer Clark Clifford (a former Secretary of Defense and key assistant to President Truman) – labeled the newly-elected Mr. Reagan “an amiable dunce.”

Clifford, a denizen of the swamp (shall we say), thought himself and those of the Washington ruling class to be far superior in every way to Ronald Reagan and any of the outsider-ilk.  Yes, his view and that of the “insiders:”- anyone not of Washington has no business or place in Washington and its affairs.  That is the constant and prevailing view of those in politics, public policy and news here in Washington.

Now the delicious point about Clifford is this: he was the actual dunce.  You see he succeeded to disgrace himself by ineptly managing and subsequently destroying all or much of the former New York Governor Harriman’s fortune during President Reagan’s time in office.

What we are seeing now, however vicious it is, is nothing new – it just puts on display what the governing class is all about, and how plainly they elevate themselves far above the public and everyday citizens.   What you see today confirms the existence of an established disposition.  So much for the concentration of government in Washington …

Shalom.

One of the twelve, named Judas Iscariot, went to the chief priests and said, “What are you willing to give me to betray Him to you?”

Mt 26:14,15

+ + +

Part of the Easter story is about betrayal.  Above we have Judas willing to betray Christ.

Coincidently, today we have many in the Democrat Party and in the media fixated, without any significant evidence, on whether or not candidate Donald Trump or his associates colluded with Vladimir Putin in the last presidential election.  Never mind that Democrat operative and Hillary Clinton campaign chief John Podesta has a private, sweetheart deal with two Russian oligarchs and that as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton approved Russian purchase of a large share of America’s uranium and received (from the purchasers) a very large financial donation to the Clinton Foundation, that – of course – has raised no private or public inquiries or objections.

Betrayal is a constant in international affairs.  Take, for example, this from Whittaker Chambers’ Witness, his extraordinary account of Soviet widespread infiltration into the pre and post-World War II federal government:

… the Communist Party could recruit its agents … by the scores within the Government … they were precisely among the most literate, intellectually eager and energetic … in the nation … (these men and women) were dedicated revolutionists whose primary allegiance was no longer to … country – nor those factors which give a country its binding force: tradition, family, community, soil, religious faith. (Emphasis added.)

Rather makes you wonder if those on the Left who find constant faults with so much in this nation and its history have any inkling of the division they create which favors our adversaries and weakens this Nation.

Think about the damage they have done to family, faith, marriage, race relations, our financial stability (as to the huge national debt accumulated in the Obama years), education, our political discourse, personal relations as to men and women, industry, law and order, etc.

Nary a thought as to how their deeds benefit our avowed adversaries.

Lest you discount betrayal, or think the Left is harmless – one of my Johns Hopkins professors is serving a life sentence in federal prison after spending 30 years spying for Fidel Castro.

Beware of the Judas Factor.

Egyptian Atrocity – ISIS attacked Christians in their church on Palm Sunday. Does anyone doubt that Christians and Western Civilization are active targets today?  Yes, you are a target of opportunity.  Pray for those who suffered great loss in Egypt … and get real.

Shalom.

Welcome Message

Categories

Log In

%d bloggers like this: