You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘Marxist Social Theory’ category.

If, today, genuine order has become incredible it is because people are not fully capable of experiencing themselves as persons with sufficient dignity and responsibility to contribute to an order in which all are fully and personally concerned.  (Emphasis added.)

Thomas Merton, in Conjectures of a Guilty Bystander

+ + +

In monastic life time and space are ordered so monks may live in an orderly manner – a manner of calm and peace, without stress – where one’s heart beats quietly and one’s mind is not conflicted, ones soul is engaged and the Divine is present.

Modern secular life is far from this state of being.  Yet, this state of being is precisely being itself.

Monks live in quiet.  They reserve time each day for work, prayer, reading and meditation.

As Merton says “a monk renounces a life of agitation and confusion for one of order and clarity.”  It is the nature of their space and its ordered time and the regularity within space and time that gives rise to clarity and an ordered life.

The monks bend to what is human by design.  You are no different from the monk as a human being but that you do not order your space and time – and not doing so you are at the “mercy” of others, other’s pressures and demands.

Mind you, those who live as godless secularists are likely to be disordered and be well assured that disordered people bring disorder to all others and any institution over which they preside.

Take measures to order your time and space.  Be vigilant that you not listen to those who are disordered – who show no stability, insight, peace, humility and wisdom.

Order your time and your space.

Shalom.

Anti-State of the Union – A few meaningless actors and actresses and one or two lesser luminaries will hold their own state of the Union where they will harangue others with Leftist nonsense.

Funny thing about them – they are full of viewpoints about how we must live our lives but they seem to have little education beyond high school (at least one is a high school drop-out) and show no evidence that they have lived particularly well.

These folks only have sway if we listen to their foolishness.  Why give them any due?

Advertisements

The liberally educated person is one who is able to resist the easy and prefered answers, not because they are obstinate but because he knows others are worthy of consideration.

Allan Bloom, in The Closing of the American Mind

+ + +

Who killed liberalism?  The Liberals … with the assistance of “education” turned into indoctrination of fruitcake social applications of Marxism.

Enter the nonsense of community-organization, feminism, “homophobia,” race baiters, multiple genders, sexism, white “privilege,” disarmament, socialism, redistribution, environmentalism, central government as omnipotent, etc.  All possessed as if these notions are, individually and collectively, the Holy Grail and justify attack on all ideas that stand in opposition to their point of view.

The question is now can this intolerant crowd once again become Liberals or whether contemporary “liberalism” will, as it now appears, to be converted to fascism and the destruction of our constitutional representative democracy – its tenets, ethos, habit, practice, civility, genius and institutions.  The choice: preservation of freedom vs. its lost.

Ironically, the present circumstances require that one might avoid colleges and universities that dumb us down.  Ditto “social media,” media commentators, traditional sources of news, academics and the Party of the Left.

Much of what you now see as assaults aimed at President Trump by the media, press, modern “liberals,” academics, Democrats, Hollywood, the entertainment world and identity groups is a clash between ill-liberalism and the existing, historic mores of our Nation.  Indeed, such a clash begins with God’s exile.  All form of evil prosper when God is denied.

We live in challenging times.  The question is this: Who are we and who will be?  Go with tradition, what has worked for a long time.  Don’t leave God.  Ride with the Wind.

Shalom.

Frequently people who seek power are not as strong as they might wish to appear.  Many people who desperately hunger for power are weak.  They seek power positions to compensate for their own fragility and vulnerability.  A weak person in power can never be generous with power because they see questions or alternative possibilities as threatening their own supremacy or dominance.  (Emphasis added.)

John O’Donoghue, in Anam Cara: A Book of Celtic Wisdom

+ + +

Celtic wisdom – valuable insight.  People do not change over the centuries.  What they have been, they are.

Three Lessons:

  • Those who seek power are often lacking.
  • They seek power to compensate.
  • Too insecure and fragile, they do not share power – seeing others and alternative ideas as a threat to them.

This is as old or older than the biblical Herod who feared an infant child.

These three simple lessons tell you about the American Left and their clinging to a derivative Marxist ideology today.  They dread opposition to their ideas.  They demand conformity to their views.  Their claims of “tolerance” manifest themselves in intolerance.  When faced with losing power they hatch extraordinary schemes to discredit and destroy those not like them.  They govern by division.  They see others as a “basket of deplorables.”  They show their fragility and insecurity in their arrogance.

As to weakness and fragility.  Think of both the Clintons.  Do they not fit this Celtic framework?  No place in life outside of politics.  Lacking in other accomplishments.  Mr. Clinton from a difficult childhood with a troubled mother.  His womanizing.  Mrs. Clinton seemingly needing to embellish on her modest history – claiming she was named Hillary after Edmund Hillary who conquered Mt. Everest even through Sir Edmund did so five years after her birth.  Insecurity.

And then there is Mr. Obama and his disordered family life.  Despite a Harvard Law degree, a lack of accomplish before his election.  His overreaching sense of his genius.  His “we are the people – we have been waiting for” sense of super-importance … and his lack of presidential accomplishment.

Those who seem lacking seek to establish themselves in power, celebrity, status, wealth and control.

Applying ancient wisdom to life can make obscure things visible and explicable.  If Celtic lore works – would not religious narrative do the same?

Shalom.

 

The American Left is getting their version of the Dickens “Christmas Carol” this year when American corporations give generous bonuses to their entire work forces after the Trump tax reform legislation.

“See Tiny Tim, people do have kindness in their heart … the government is not needed to see people caring for one another!”

# # #

Each one has to find … peace from within.  And peace to be real must be unaffected by outside circumstances.  (Emphasis added.)

Mahatma Gandhi

+ + +

Finding peace in a mass communication culture must be intentional.  That is, to find peace one must set about to discretely select what one hears and what one does not hear, what one does and what one does not do.

Yes, we must work.  But if one seeks the calm that is “peace within” one must consciously and intentionally secure time that produces peace, quiet, healthy inattention to that which captures us, occupies the mind, worries the heart.

Christ sought peace by withdrawal to the desert.  He sought it in time alone, in quiet – in prayer.

Although I live in the quiet of a mountain ridge, I must consciously disengage from the habit of being busy – cleaning the house, running errands, talking on the cell, etc.

We live in a culture that draws us into it.  We are stimulated each day by news, and messages, noise, responsibilities, attractions.  But are these matters not obstacles to peace, tranquility, comfort, a slower heart beat, less stress, less preoccupation.  Most people live in worry and do not live in the moment.  Missing the moment one loses the peace of that moment, the grace of one’s heart beat.

Look at the political world – people are frantic.  No one leads who is frantic.

The ideologues are, to put it plainly, unhealthy – on the verge of insanity.  Their shrill proclamations are the voice of sickness, constant discontent, unhappiness – even anger at times.  People like Senator Schumer and Representative Pelosi, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren are visibly hectic and “on edge.”  Is this any way to peace?  No.

Shalom.

Tip of the Hat – A tip of the hat to Senators Orrin Hatch (Utah) and Tim Scott (South Carolina) for the gracious manner in which they conduct their public business.

It is a delight to see gentlemen in public life.  Bravo!  We are well served by men such as these.

 

 

 

Therefore, my dear brothers and sisters, stand firm.  Let nothing move you.  Always give yourselves fully to the word of the Lord, because you know the labor in the Lord is not in vain.  (Emphasis added.)

1 Cor 15:58

+ + +

St. Paul is addressing the people of Corinth.  He speaks of courage.

I often say to others that “all courage flows from faith.”  Yes, St. Paul makes this point: to stand firm in life – in ordinary and troubled times – one must have faith, be of faith – trust in the word of the Lord.

There are similar passages in the Old Testament that make this point as well.  You see, that is the dynamic of faith in times that require courage of each of us.  We live in such times today.

There are many among us who prefer we listen to them, adopt their faithless views.  Much of what has been propounded by those without faith (the abortionists, the racists, those wedded to power and control, those who put their trust in gender and sexual practices – to mention but some) speak without belief – speak and act without reference to God, indeed speak as if God does not matter, does not exist or is “the enemy.”

Those of us who believe must summon the courage to speak in opposition to what is godless, destructive, divisive – even evil.  Yes, in faith comes courage and in courage we speak.

Yesterday I had a conversation with a woman whose thoughts went only to gender.  Her sight was very narrow – all matters centered on her concern about her gender and sexuality.  She saw her existence through that narrow bodily prism.  It was like talking to a brainwashed fanatic.  She had no point of reference but her gender and sexuality.  She had been reduced to much less than who she has been divinely made to be.

This is the nature of absurdity that the Left has given us in their “identity politics.”  People no longer see who they are – and like intemperate, spoiled children they scream and hold their breath in fits of rage and lunacy having abandoned all sense they have been given.

People like this are akin to “the possessed,” the demonic.  There is no discourse with them, nor do their words warrant our time or attention.  Sadly they discredit themselves.

Yes, we face this challenge: to restore common sense and maturity to those whose disposition is godless and hostile.  Failing to do that we will not have a nation or a community, friendship and peace.

The biggest part of our present task is to reject the poisonous fruit of “identity politics” which has propounded what is false, reductive, divisive and attempts to make normative that which is not.  Our best approach: do not listen to those who are possessed.

Yes, as St. Paul says – give yourself to the word of the Lord and have the courage to speak and witness truth to what is false and destructive.

Shalom.  

The mistake that you make … is thinking one can live in a corrupt society without being corrupt oneself.

George Orwell

+ + +

A glance at the condition of the Justice Department’s handling of the Clinton investigation or the current Special Counsel’s activities might give just pause to think about Orwell’s statement.

Likewise the past administration’s suspension of drug interdiction that allowed Middle East terrorists to smuggle drugs into our country so as to placate the Iranians and preserve the dubious agreement to further Iran’s nuclear program also prompts reflection on Orwell’s proposition.  Ditto, “Fast and Furious” whereby the Justice Department gave guns to Mexican drug gang members that eventually were used to kill an American law enforcement officer.  And then there is the IRS targeting conservative organizations and forestalling their applications for tax exempt status might also cause some soul-searching as to Orwell’s comment.

Think about where we are today in this culture.  Think about the daily drumbeat designed to discredit a duly elected President because one either doesn’t fancy him, or because one is “offended” that their candidate did not win, or because he does not fit the Washington-way where everyone participates in a privileged event for “insiders” – members of the governing-club, the Skull and Bones of politics.

You know when you attend church this Holy Season and kneel to pray, I wonder if you’ll think of today’s events and how they might implicate those who remain silent.

When you hear “Silent Night” sung, I wonder if you might ask yourself: Am I to remain silent today?

Shalom.

Stumbling, Bumbling, Fumbling – That’s your Federal government – that’s the GSA’s (General Services Administration) handing over private emails belonging to private citizens to Special Counsel Mueller who had no legal approval to seize these emails.

It seems Mr. Mueller and others know less about ethics and law than required. It is the Gang that can’t shoot straight looking for the Gang that can’t shoot straight – when all they need to do is to look in the mirror.

Wonder why people have no confidence in the Department of Justice,  the FBI, the Special Counsel and government at large?  They see what they see.

Remember it takes only one clown to make a circus.  Seems we have more on hand than required.

… consciousness of (only) the present may lead to an elation based on illusion: the illusion, namely, that we are the culmination of the history of mankind, the fulfilment and the end-product of countless centuries.

Carl Jung, M.D. in “The Spiritual Problem of Modern Man”

+ + +

Jung warns us that when we lose track of our place in the long saga of human history we begin to think of ourselves as special and forfeit access to both truth and humility.

It follows, of course, that mistakes and miscalculations escalate when this we lose perspective.  In the present day, by the way, the wise live on the foundation of a humility and reality that is garnered from knowing the nature and course of humans as rendered in the long record of human existence.  There are, as the present world demonstrates, fewer wise men and women than once there were.

Jung makes, by the way, this point – to think more of ourselves than we are entitled is the error of modern man and the action of those misguided elites is a testament to their destitution.  Boy, don’t we see that with the Democrat Left, within the massive federal government, in Hollywood, among celebrities and so many other quarters.

Observes Jung: ” … modern man … is … the worst conceivable disappointment of the hopes of humankind.”

I do not know if I agree with that or not – but I do know that absent knowledge of human history and the truths it establishes, we deny reality, forfeit humility, create our own discontent, multiply both errors and the margin for error.

I know this as well – the Judeo-Christian religious narrative is an invaluable source of knowledge and wisdom and that dismissing this narrative is the single most foolish mistake we make – indeed, this alone accounts for the relatively easy destruction of our nation and the West.

Shalom.

Postscript – If what Jung has said makes sense to you, you’re best play is to be very discreet when it comes to listening to others.  Case in point: Does anyone on CNN make any sense?  Do they (and others) warrant your attention?

Sorry about not posting yesterday.  Christmas tasks, helping my neighbors and a birthday resulted in a full plate.

# # #

(The modern man) has become “unhistorical” in the deepest sense and has estranged himself from the mass of men who live entirely within the bounds of tradition …

To be “unhistorical” is the Promethean sin, and in this sense the modern man lives in sin.

Carl Jung, M.D. in “The Spiritual Problem of Modern Man”

+ + +

I have had many conversations with people who notice that the world around them has changed, grown more hostile, more divided – been altered in a fundamental way.

While these people realize the change is led by particular groups and resides in institutions like government, media, politics and universities they cannot put a handle on this, come to comprehend what precisely is the genesis of this adverse, divisive and troublesome development.

They would be wise to read Carl Jung’s essay entitled “The Spiritual Problem of Modern Man.”

Mind you, Jung tells us that the “modern man” is not the average man – but rather he describes the elite members of society.

He is, says Jung, the “man of the immediate present” – one for whom history has disappeared.  He is the man without the past and without its guidance and its wisdom.

He is the man only conscious of himself in the immediate moment – devoid of consistent actions from month to month, whose unconscious state is literally unavailable to him.  He is a man without a spiritual life or vision … a material man with greatly limited vision.

He is a diminished man, a small remnant of a human being – but oh so assertive and sure.  He is a man with the certainty of one who knows little but what he desires in the immediate.  His ideas are as fanciful as they are grandiose.  He is the utopian man – man as his own god.  He is the socialist man, the communist ideologue or depot, the fascist dictator, the totalitarian, the anarchist, the Leftist.

He is the man “above” the mass of others – in his own mind better than others, smarter, destined (he believes) to prevail and to be obeyed.

Today we would say he is the entitled Hillary Clinton, the impractical know-it-all intellectual, op-ed writer with little scale or scope, the celebrity, the TV talking head, the social media mogul, the Leftist in the federal agency or Department, the member of the judiciary or the simpleton with a law degree and a large ego.

He is the very limited person who, regardless of facts, makes decisions that suit his bias and desires.  He is the man who denies reality.  He is the spoiled child subject to tantrums that are rewarded by weak parents.

He is the man of “today’s” culture, of its fads and trends, its avant-garde ideology and loony thoughts of 13 genders and villages that raise children, and borderless countries, emerging racial division, “safe spaces” and political “correctness.”  His followers are the sycophants, and as Jung says: “uprooted human beings.”

The modern man has cast aside the consciousness that comes from knowing the past.  He lacks humility and in this is more destructive and less human than he realizes.  He is the agent of chaos.

Shalom.

Predators – All these disgustings acts of sexual predators (male and female) have an origin.  Stand up Lefties and take a bow for your essential contribution: “The Sexual Revolution!”  You own it.

 

 

Computer Back – Daily Posts Again

# # #

He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood abides in Me, and I in him.

Jn 6:56

+ + +

These are Jesus words in the Gospel of John.

You might recall that some of those who heard these words were appalled.  Many who heard these words walked away from Jesus.

What are we to learn from this?  We are not literal beings, we are spiritual beings.

Our present culture and its education system dumbs us down.  And I mean even the people in positions of “authority,” in media – in particular.  Indeed, we are well served by asking our self: Are those I am listening to or reading smart enough, insightful enough, to warrant my listening to them?  In many cases, the answer is likely to be “No.”

Think about the ideologues who flood the public conversations.

Ideologies are silly shorthand ways of thinking.  They dismiss the fullness of the human person and deny our depth of experience.  In the worse cases – entities like CNN and efforts like the current Special Counsel are little more than ideologically-charged propaganda organs.  Likewise the recent words of Federal Judges put in question their value.  Law, politics and communication lose their value.

What might one conclude?

When a culture moves away from religious belief, it reduces the innate wisdom and native understanding that a person possesses.  In short, a culture devoid of religious belief houses individuals with limited insight, no wisdom and little understanding who are unable to experience the whole range of human existence, maintain healthy human relations or have regard for anyone but themselves and whose with whom they share idiotic ideological dispositions.  In the present small-minded culture limited beings seek to dismiss or destroy anyone who does not siddle up to them.  Pathetic.

Shalom.

 

Christians … were much more rigorous about matters of sex than the prevailing attitudes in the Roman Empire; they did not forget their founder’s fierce disapproval of divorce … either party in a non-Christian Roman marriage could declare the relationship to be at an end.  Likewise, abortion and the abandonment of unwanted children were accepted as regrettable necessities in Roman society, but like the Jews, the Christians were insistent that these practices were completely unacceptable.  (Emphasis added.)

Diarmaid MacCulloch, in Christianity: The First Three Thousand Years

+ + +

Oxford Historian MacCulloch lays it right out there for us to read and think about.  He writes here of the early church and their opposition to divorce, abortion, child abandonment.  He shows us the vast difference between the Romans and Roman authorities and Christians, Believers.

While public entities, governments, and politicians have not changed much from those in ancient Rome, Western Culture has departed from its Judeo-Christians.

Look simply at today’s election in Alabama.  One Senate candidate is being accused by women as having shown unwelcome interest in them 40 years ago.  Their accusations are not laid out in detail and none at this point have offered sworn statements regarding their allocations.  Unwilling to say anything about their allegations for four decades – the women now appear on the eve of a Senatorial election to level accusations against the Republican candidate.

Pardon me if I smell a set-up here … but I recall vividly what Democrat Leftists did to Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas with the unsubstantiated claims of Anita Hill that Mr. Thomas uttered odd and suggestive words to her.  You see images of video lynchings are not easily forgotten nor are the craven actions of the Democrat Left who count power and ideology more important than truth.

In contrast the Democrat candidate in Alabama today is plainly pro-abortion and this established fact has no weight in today’s public conversation about sexual mores and mortal behavior.

So we have unsubstantiated allegations vs. established pro-abortion.  One think the we are living as Romans at least in the news rooms and among members of the national news media.

We have regressed since the early days of Christianity.  We no longer see the issues that were quite clear to Jews and Christians 2000 years ago.  Ironically, today’s sexual mess, family deconstruction, pornography, unwed mothers and fatherless families, etc. are the product of the Left’s advocacy and lax morality; and we, regrettably, have been bent to their misshaped ideas, attitudes and policies.

So one concludes two things: one, the early Christians knew better than we as to what constitutes a good, stable and elevated life and, two the Left has worn out its welcome.  They have done enough damage.

Shalom.

 

Advertisements

Welcome Message

Categories

Log In

%d bloggers like this: