You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘Conflict’ category.

People gain a sense of meaning when their lives cohere across levels … of existence.

Jonathan Haidt, in The Happiness Hypothesis

+ + +

Here psychologist Jonathan Haidt is referring to these levels: psychological, physical and sociocultural.  I use this quote to make one point: namely, the human person is complex.  We are not just “reason,” nor are we governed by reason as Haidt so expertly shows in his work.

Indeed, if you need to understand the complexity of the human person just become familiar with Haidt’s discourse on the complexity of the brain (Chapter I in The Happiness Hypothesis) which details how various parts of the brain have evolved over time, how parts of the brain to some extent compete with one another – and how in some people portions of the brain can overrun others making a life go rather dramatically “off track.”

So why do I call attention to this?

I mention this because public discourse does not conform to what Haidt and others know about the functioning of the human person.  To be more particular, political discourse is far, far from reflective of reality and seemingly utterly ignorant of just how people function, how errant conduct proceeds in the human person – how conduct is often the product of varied or injured aspects of one’s brain vs. a normative condition of healthy neuro-functioning.

Stated plainly, the ideologues of the Left (people like Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Barack Obama and so many others) proceed with Karl Marx and his 19th century notions as if they are the pinnacle of insight and intelligence –(a) despite evidence that communist societies and their economics are proven disasters, and (b) as if we know nothing in the last 150 years of neuroscience and the derivative functioning of the human brain from its wellness to its imperfections and range of capacities. 

Stated plainly – the lesser “intellects” (using this term very loosely) promote “sexual freedom” and propound gender nonsense without any regard to neuroscience, psychology or sociocultural and interpersonal consequences.  Ditto, the advocates of drug use, the normalization of homosexuality, the public policy creations of intergenerational public dependency, fatherless families, the soft bigotry of “affirmative action,” the stupidity and fiction of an omnipotent and wise central government, socialism and the devaluing and dismissal of individual responsibility, sacred narratives, tradition and religion and consciousness of God.

Reading Haidt it is hard not to conclude – we are influenced by intellectual dullards and those with parrot-like recitations of outdated Leftists foolishness.  Ugh!  So far from good sense, knowledge, humility, Truth and wisdom of the Ages.  Fools causing calamity.

Shalom.

 

Advertisements

Sorry about not posting yesterday.  Christmas tasks, helping my neighbors and a birthday resulted in a full plate.

# # #

(The modern man) has become “unhistorical” in the deepest sense and has estranged himself from the mass of men who live entirely within the bounds of tradition …

To be “unhistorical” is the Promethean sin, and in this sense the modern man lives in sin.

Carl Jung, M.D. in “The Spiritual Problem of Modern Man”

+ + +

I have had many conversations with people who notice that the world around them has changed, grown more hostile, more divided – been altered in a fundamental way.

While these people realize the change is led by particular groups and resides in institutions like government, media, politics and universities they cannot put a handle on this, come to comprehend what precisely is the genesis of this adverse, divisive and troublesome development.

They would be wise to read Carl Jung’s essay entitled “The Spiritual Problem of Modern Man.”

Mind you, Jung tells us that the “modern man” is not the average man – but rather he describes the elite members of society.

He is, says Jung, the “man of the immediate present” – one for whom history has disappeared.  He is the man without the past and without its guidance and its wisdom.

He is the man only conscious of himself in the immediate moment – devoid of consistent actions from month to month, whose unconscious state is literally unavailable to him.  He is a man without a spiritual life or vision … a material man with greatly limited vision.

He is a diminished man, a small remnant of a human being – but oh so assertive and sure.  He is a man with the certainty of one who knows little but what he desires in the immediate.  His ideas are as fanciful as they are grandiose.  He is the utopian man – man as his own god.  He is the socialist man, the communist ideologue or depot, the fascist dictator, the totalitarian, the anarchist, the Leftist.

He is the man “above” the mass of others – in his own mind better than others, smarter, destined (he believes) to prevail and to be obeyed.

Today we would say he is the entitled Hillary Clinton, the impractical know-it-all intellectual, op-ed writer with little scale or scope, the celebrity, the TV talking head, the social media mogul, the Leftist in the federal agency or Department, the member of the judiciary or the simpleton with a law degree and a large ego.

He is the very limited person who, regardless of facts, makes decisions that suit his bias and desires.  He is the man who denies reality.  He is the spoiled child subject to tantrums that are rewarded by weak parents.

He is the man of “today’s” culture, of its fads and trends, its avant-garde ideology and loony thoughts of 13 genders and villages that raise children, and borderless countries, emerging racial division, “safe spaces” and political “correctness.”  His followers are the sycophants, and as Jung says: “uprooted human beings.”

The modern man has cast aside the consciousness that comes from knowing the past.  He lacks humility and in this is more destructive and less human than he realizes.  He is the agent of chaos.

Shalom.

Predators – All these disgustings acts of sexual predators (male and female) have an origin.  Stand up Lefties and take a bow for your essential contribution: “The Sexual Revolution!”  You own it.

 

 

Jung felt that the pursuit of wholeness was essential for redressing the split between the conscious and the unconscious.  Although the differentiation … is a natural part of psychiatric development, a total break between the two realms can cause psychic problems.

Curtis D. Smith, Ph.D., in Jung’s Quest for Wholeness

+ + +

Dr. Smith, a Jungian psychologist whose focus is human development and the history of religion, goes on to quote Carl Jung, M.D., who said the “more powerful and independent consciousness becomes, and with it conscious will” the less well and whole we are. In this state, psychic problems follow.

Why do I bring this up?

Well it is quite simple.  I hear from people quite often that they see and encounter people whose actions seem disordered, selfish, troubled, and without concern for others, irrational.  Indeed, Jung is talking about this very issue – about people who are “unconscious” – cut off from their whole being.

Dr. Jung is talking about human wholeness – the unification of the whole human person – the person’s full human development (intellectual, social, emotional, interpersonal, spiritual, etc.) as the object of our creation and existence; and I am concerned that culture can either advance or impede this development.  Further (having studied the relationship between faith and exclusionary secular culture) I see that we produce an abundance of unhealthy, even disintegrated individuals, and that unnecessary chaos, conflict, suffering, division and isolation abound.  May I reference Harvey Weinstein and the legions of married female teachers engaged in sexual conduct with their underage students as “a for instance.”

Consistent with Jung, when man becomes the exclusive focus of man the individual self becomes all important and man’s reason is cultivated at the cost of the unconscious aspects of his being.  Said another way, when man is focused exclusively on man his psyche (soul) is forgotten and problems manifest.

Yes, in our secularized culture we have become one-dimensional, trapped in self and materiality but devoid of a metaphysical intelligence (and spiritual maturity) and hence fall short of the capacity for a full range of experience and human development.  Frankly, we are not well.  We are fragmented at best – lack the capacity for introspection, self-examination, intimacy, and the ability to receive others.  To the contrary, we objectify others and cannot fully comprehend the bizarre actions (even tragedies) that surround us.

Case in point: we are mystified by the actions of Las Vegas mass murderer Stephen Paddock.  His autopsy shows no brain damage to explain his rampage and the authorities can find no particular motive, personal social footprint or provocation for his actions.

Unable to see as other than diminished secularists, they ignore the Unibomber in explaining Mr. Paddock.  They do not recall the Unibomber’s rage arouse from his parents who demanded he forsake other people and things, from childhood on, in favor of constant study.  His parents made him a slave of his intellect.

Yes, in a single fit of rage as a teenager he screamed this to them: “You never let me have a friend!”

It is hard to imagine a more chilling indictment of one’s parents nor a more dreadful, socially starved existence.  He, like Paddock, was a greatly diminished person, one far from wholeness – asocial, isolated, alone.

The neglect of our God-given fullness is the cause of the serious disorder among the godless from top to bottom of the social strata.  We are devoted to self and self alone – and far less well for it.

If we continue in this way, our suffering and murderous chaos, abhorrent interpersonal behavior, group violence, corruption and cover-up, and our isolation one from another will continue us on a destructive, evil path.

When God is neglected, the soul cannot be well.  We prove this daily.

Shalom.

Personally, I have found the Devil easier to believe in … it seems quite extraordinary that anyone should have failed to notice during the last half century, a diabolic presence pulling us downward as gravity does instead of pressing upwards as trees and plants do when they grow and reach so resolutely and beautifully after the light. (Emphasis added.)

Malcolm Muggeridge, in Jesus: The Man Who Lives

+ + +

Muggeridge wrote the above in a book published in 1975.  Matters have only gotten far worse in the West and in America in the last 45 years.

Yes, pagan behavior is now widespread and the quest of the godless now is that pagan ways be accepted as normal … and that Godly ways be banished.

Killing has increased.  Racial hostility has ramped up to besmirch the 1960 efforts at racial harmony.  Many divisions have grown – enhanced by Leftist “identity politics” which is aimed to divide and stoke anger – even violence.

Nations have come to doubt their value and now deny their history, their heritage, their achievement, their legitimacy.  Their confusion and self-doubt, even self-loathing, is evidence of Satan’s work.

Now there is darkness where once there was light.

This brings to mind Satan’s third test of Christ in the desert – his offer that all the kingdoms of the world might be Christ’s if he but worshiped Satan. (Mt 4: 1-11)

In thinking about what Muggeridge said I think, in particular, how politics dominates so much of our public commentary and attention.  In this I hear not Christ but Satan … the third temptation continues and is aimed at the godless masses so conformed to “identity politics” to seek power over all by “any means necessary.”

Yes, I hear the voice of Satan in the words of many selfish advocates.

The antics of the American Left in their relentless attack on the Presidency and their refusal to offer constructive action to serve their nation and restore faith and moral conduct to civic life is further indication of the decline Muggeridge observes … and echoes Satan today.

While our political life is important, it is not a greater goal than faithful life and the community of friends that can be, and must be, in America in the hostile and violent world we face today.

Think about it – Have we not focused too much on politics to the exclusion of God?  Have we not failed Christ, and the Loving Father at very great cost?

Shalom.

Question – The liberal protesters invaded the U.S. Senate Chamber today and interrupted Senate business by shouting incoherently predictable Leftist drivel. My question: Who the hell designated these people the moral arbiters of the planet?  They do nothing. Know nothing.  Contribute nothing.  Work at nothing. Create nothing.  Offer nothing.  Earn nothing.  Build nothing.  But expect people to listen to them.

 

If we wish to please the true God and to be friends to the most blessed of friendships, let us present our spirit naked to God.  Let us not draw on anything of this present world – no art, no thought, no reasoning, no self-justification – even though we should possess all the wisdom of the world.

Philokalia

+ + +

In a mass communication culture where we are assaulted with words, noise, chatter endlessly we would do well to think about the above words recorded by 4th and 5th century Orthodox Christians.

Yes, we are to know about the world, to gain knowledge – but we are not to be encased in reasoning, self-justification, art, thought or other artifacts of the present world – from trinkets and valuables, to politics and ideology because we are at ground zero spiritual beings … those tied to God by God’s creation of us and the world we occupy.

We are not consumers, pundits, lawyers, actors, CEO’s, professors … etc.  We are more than those things.  We have an eternal identity.

In today’s world it is wise to ask: how can I be exactly and precisely who God made me to be?  In this objective is health, stability, calm, contentment, quiet, patience, wisdom, morality, laughter, good judgement, ease, friendship, strength, loyalty, honor, love and salvation.

Ironically, in a culture that seeks to draw you in and under – the task is to stay afloat and aloft – above all the calamity, craziness, conflict and confusion.

Yes, the task at present: to live a monk’s life in mass culture, to take on independence and autonomy, gain humility and pleasure in all that God has given, all that God does, all that we have been made to be, all that God is.

Shalom.

If you find this helpful, please share it with others – friends, family members, neighbors and colleagues.

 We can all get better at living, gain peace, tranquility, stability and purpose – come to know joy as God provides it.

 

On the altar in my hermitage in France are images of Buddha and Jesus, and every time I light incense, I touch both of them as my spiritual ancestors … When you touch someone who authentically represents a tradition, you not only touch his or her tradition, you also touch your own. This quality is essential to dialogue.

Thich Nhat Hanh, in Living Buddha, Living Christ

+ + +

Tradition is profoundly important.  It is, as Thich says, essential to dialogue. Without tradition one cannot easily acquire the experience of another for traditions convey human experience, reality discovered over centuries, truth as to human beings and the supernatural.

In America, today, we have little constructive or civic dialogue between the Left and the rest of us.  Rather, we hear very harsh, hostile and angry language from the Left.  Their word and conduct decry this fact: those at war with others are at war with themselves.

War, you say.  Yes.

The Left feels betrayed.  They lost power and an election that felt sure they would win … one they and their candidate felt entitled to win.

Indeed, they feel rejected and cannot come to understand as they must, in these circumstances, that they must look within to ask: why is this so?  Why did so many others not favor them?

Yes, they have been betrayed.  But not by those who voted for their opponent – but rather by their ideology – an ideology which attacks tradition and faith that is its common witness.  In short, the Left has attacked and opposed tradition and religion.

As to ideology, it has no long human history.  It is a recent human construct, a fiction of intellect – not a vehicle of human and divine truth.  It is simply: a lie … and to live a lie is a personal betrayal, self-deception from which no authentic dialogue can arise.

In the West, the modern liberals and the Left have chosen intellect over faith, power over humility, what is false on its face from what is and has been sustained truth about humans and eternity.

If we are to have a civil society, the Left will have to see their errors and change their ways rather dramatically.  On our part, we must be present in kindness and calm to receive them when they desire to advance civil community once again.

Shalom.

Now the Lord said to Abram, “Go forth from your country … To the land that I will show you; and I will make of you a great nation … And in you all the families of the earth will be blessed.”

Gen 12: 1, 2, 3

+ + +

I sit in the morning fog in God’s green land.  Behind the mist are the pastures and the hills and mountains that I am sure to see when the veil is lifted and the sky is opened. I listen to De Profundis and Palestrina’s Gloria from Missa Papae Marcelli.

The news of the world is troubling.  In this land we wake to stories of overdoses, and of the murder of two young Muslim teenage boys on the eve of their high school graduation, both honor students on their way to college, and of conflicts and hostilities in Asia, the Middle East, Europe and Africa.  In our legislature the Party out of power acts like spoiled children, turns to obstruction while problems pile up and division disheartens.  Small groups act like angry pagans demanding this or that.  Racism surfaces among those once its victim.  The morning fog cannot hide the shame of this.

It had been four centuries without a prophet until Jesus emerged.  Four centuries.  Our Jewish brothers and sisters wondered why God was silent.  Then we received The Word, Immanuel – “God with us.”

We have been given the opportunity to become the children of God, to become the great nation that Abraham was called to bring forth.

Children of God and children of Abraham, but how do we act today?  We act as if there was no Abraham, no Jesus and there is no God.

Today we seek to create good through human acts but in place of good is conflict, discontent, selfishness, hatred.  The flesh and the will of man cannot triumph … it is God who perfects man, not man who prefects man.  Like Abraham we must be His vehicle, His instrument.

Like you I see the conflict, the needless hurt, the arrogance of man and woman, the reliance on self as if we are God.  We have credited ourselves with wisdom and power we do not have.

The good and wise man is humble, speaks softly – sees others as his family.

Are you the good and wise man?  Am I?

Shalom.

 

 

… in every society where the distinction of ranks has once been completely established, there have been always two different … systems of morality current at the same time; … one may be called the strict … the other the liberal, or … the loose system.  The former admired and revered by the common people, the latter … by … people of fashion.  (Emphasis added.)

Adam Smith, in The Wealth of Nations

+ + +

This is Smith writing in 1776.  His book had a huge impact.  Its date coincided with the founding of the United States.

What Smith said then is as useful now as it has been over the last 241 years. Smith knew people.  He knew power, and he knew politics.

What he said then is visible to us today.

We have groomed a collection of elites.  These are the privileged people – the super-rich and the very affluent.  We see them in national politics, among ex-Presidents, on the bench, in the media, in entertainment, among those newly wealthy in the computer and internet industry, within the highly-educated class and in the tenured positions at once prestigious colleges.

These are people who live well above the income level of the common person – their morals are not the morals of common people.  Regrettably their privileged lives convince them that they know better than the commoners and that this licenses them to enforce their morals (such as they are) on the rest of us … along with their public policies.

Ah, but their interests are not our interests.  They do not suffer when factory jobs disappear and when small towns no longer present a place to work and raise a family free of addictions, dependency and hopelessness.

This privileged class manifests less need for faith than the commoner.  Hence, their morals are unlike the commoner.  Surely not better, but rather uniquely destructive, divisive and unhealthy.

As Adams says so well, the morals of the privileged are ruinous …  and because they are wealthy, the elites can sustain years of disorder far longer than the commoner.

That said, when a nation loses its identity to illegal invaders, when abortion is a form of “birth control,” and the spread of terrorism takes the life of innocents, of children and unarmed men and women – the time for the loose morals and destructive policies and preferences of elites comes to an end.  THIS IS BRIXET AND THE HILLARY CLINTON AND DEMOCRATIC DEFEAT AT THE POLLS.  This is how one explains that the Democrats captured only 64 of the over 3000 counties in the U.S. in the last presidential election.

The heinous photo of a minor female “entertainer” holding the severed head of President Trump tells you three important things: one, the morals of the privileged are not the morals of the common person; two, the curve is bending back on the Liberals (the privileged class in both political parties) and their attitudes and disposition; and three, the relentless attacks on the President are the elites clutching at control, attempting to retain power at all costs … power over the common person.

Ah, but the times may well be changing.

Shalom.

Please note: the Post for May 30, 2017, will be added approximately noontime, U.S. East Coast time.

…Cain brought an offering to the Lord from the fruit of the soil, while Abel, for his part, brought one of the best firstlings from his flock.  The Lord looked with favor on Abel and his offering, but on Cain and his offering he did not.  Cain greatly resented this …

Cain said to his brother Abel, “Let us go out in the field.”  When they were in the field, Cain attacked his brother Abel and killed him.

Gen 4: 3, 4, 5, 8

+ + +

What are we to make of this story?  What might we learn?

God favored the younger Abel over his older brother, the firstborn of Adam and Eve. Cain is deeply resentful and murders his brother.  Might we carry something significant from this, something that would give us wisdom, teach us a fundamental truth about God, the world, human beings, you?

Universalism does not apply to God.  God gets to do what God wishes to do.  In faith we realize that there is a point being made, something significant to be learned and retained.

Here we realize, we do not govern God.  God gets to pick who and what is favored. We, like Cain, cause real problems when we impose our views on God, and rebel when our point of view, reasoning, expectations, desires are not met.

In God’s favoring of the younger son over the older, the story demonstrates that man’s law is not imposed on God or God’s law.

This brings me to “social justice” – a man-made vehicle to force all sorts of human claims on others.  And to “human rights” which is similarly used to disparage those who do not fit the view of this group or that.  In each instance, the proponents are Cain.  Arrogant, special pleaders – forcing views on others as if they are God.

Cain failed to force his view on God.  Might we learn something very useful from that?

I am constantly reminded that most of the liberal dialogue imposed on the public is rife with ignorance and that it does great damage … is unexamined, not put to the test.

Unabated, the liberals end as Cain – discontented with a world that does not bend to their desire, and killing others and creating conflict and division where it need not be.  Like Cain, they try to force their views on others and on God.  Disaster follows.

Shalom.

Postscript – Marxism, Marxist social theory, the Left, “progressives,” Communists, American liberals today force their views on others at all cost.  They are aggressive, arrogant, harsh, antagonistic, intolerant, conflicting, divisive, destructive and quite often wrong.  Does the Cain and Abel story inform us today?

Remarkable Reception for President Trump in Saudi Arabia.  The Saudis are to be applauded for the warmth and dignity they display.  This could be a significant turning point.  So much for the notion that President Trump is the Devil incarnate.

# # # 

… the state threatened to become not only militarily and politically triumphant but psychologically so: the custodial Superego for millions … their Egos an instrument, pure and simple, of the state’s bureaucratic manipulation.

Robert Coles, M.D. in A Secular Mind

+ + +

Dr. Coles, an esteemed research psychiatrist, is commenting on Nobel Laureate Czeslaw Milosz’s observations in his book entitled A Captive Mind in which he explores the consequences of (Communist) centralized state power over the individual person.

Doctor Coles ends his book about the secularized mind by focusing on the apparent need for the modern state to secure social and psychological control over its population.  And, Coles focuses on the prospects of neurochemistry and medical science in doing so.

As to the latter point, Coles draws on advances in neuroscience, biology and medicine – particularly on developments in pharmacology – reminding us that Sigmund Freud thought that in time the mind itself might be reduced to simple matter and ministered to (and perhaps altered substantially) by medications. That is to say, that the experience of being human would change rather significantly.

This, by the way, has been a theme expressed over time by a number of people from Orwell, to Huxley, to Stanislaw Witkiewicz and others, and displayed in Phillip Dick’s 1968 movie Blade Runner.

The notion of centralized control over the person leads me to think more critically of the divisions between those who despise Donald Trump and those who voted for him.

In thinking about this I see Trump as an unimportant focus.  It is not he himself that matters but rather the significance of the divide between those who voted for him and those who are clearly threatened by him, and seem to hate him.

It seems to me that the divide is what is important.

That said, I think one can make a reasonable observation that the difference is in part the distinction between those who favor centralized power and those who do not.  In effect, we are talking about those who favor government control over the social and psychological nature of the human person and those who oppose the same.

Illustratively, the Left favors imposing their “views” on others – i.e., forced “tolerance.” Some in the middle ground default to continued growth in government to the extent that sovereignty and national identity and nation itself is devolved to international organizations and competing cultures (i.e., globalists).

In opposition to this, of course, are those who favor less government and preservation of nation, individual freedom and continued American economic prosperity and ethos, and constitutional Federalism.

We have simply stated: globalists vs. nationalists.

So the question today is not Trump but what underpins the divide?  Why his adversaries violently oppose him?  Why the hatred and effort to drive him from office?

My view is that it has to do with a very fundamental question: Will we live in a country where control over the human person expands as the power of the central government and international organizations expands or will we not?

Shalom.

Advertisements

Welcome Message

Categories

Log In

%d bloggers like this: