You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘Conflict’ category.

Personally, I have found the Devil easier to believe in … it seems quite extraordinary that anyone should have failed to notice during the last half century, a diabolic presence pulling us downward as gravity does instead of pressing upwards as trees and plants do when they grow and reach so resolutely and beautifully after the light. (Emphasis added.)

Malcolm Muggeridge, in Jesus: The Man Who Lives

+ + +

Muggeridge wrote the above in a book published in 1975.  Matters have only gotten far worse in the West and in America in the last 45 years.

Yes, pagan behavior is now widespread and the quest of the godless now is that pagan ways be accepted as normal … and that Godly ways be banished.

Killing has increased.  Racial hostility has ramped up to besmirch the 1960 efforts at racial harmony.  Many divisions have grown – enhanced by Leftist “identity politics” which is aimed to divide and stoke anger – even violence.

Nations have come to doubt their value and now deny their history, their heritage, their achievement, their legitimacy.  Their confusion and self-doubt, even self-loathing, is evidence of Satan’s work.

Now there is darkness where once there was light.

This brings to mind Satan’s third test of Christ in the desert – his offer that all the kingdoms of the world might be Christ’s if he but worshiped Satan. (Mt 4: 1-11)

In thinking about what Muggeridge said I think, in particular, how politics dominates so much of our public commentary and attention.  In this I hear not Christ but Satan … the third temptation continues and is aimed at the godless masses so conformed to “identity politics” to seek power over all by “any means necessary.”

Yes, I hear the voice of Satan in the words of many selfish advocates.

The antics of the American Left in their relentless attack on the Presidency and their refusal to offer constructive action to serve their nation and restore faith and moral conduct to civic life is further indication of the decline Muggeridge observes … and echoes Satan today.

While our political life is important, it is not a greater goal than faithful life and the community of friends that can be, and must be, in America in the hostile and violent world we face today.

Think about it – Have we not focused too much on politics to the exclusion of God?  Have we not failed Christ, and the Loving Father at very great cost?

Shalom.

Question – The liberal protesters invaded the U.S. Senate Chamber today and interrupted Senate business by shouting incoherently predictable Leftist drivel. My question: Who the hell designated these people the moral arbiters of the planet?  They do nothing. Know nothing.  Contribute nothing.  Work at nothing. Create nothing.  Offer nothing.  Earn nothing.  Build nothing.  But expect people to listen to them.

 

If we wish to please the true God and to be friends to the most blessed of friendships, let us present our spirit naked to God.  Let us not draw on anything of this present world – no art, no thought, no reasoning, no self-justification – even though we should possess all the wisdom of the world.

Philokalia

+ + +

In a mass communication culture where we are assaulted with words, noise, chatter endlessly we would do well to think about the above words recorded by 4th and 5th century Orthodox Christians.

Yes, we are to know about the world, to gain knowledge – but we are not to be encased in reasoning, self-justification, art, thought or other artifacts of the present world – from trinkets and valuables, to politics and ideology because we are at ground zero spiritual beings … those tied to God by God’s creation of us and the world we occupy.

We are not consumers, pundits, lawyers, actors, CEO’s, professors … etc.  We are more than those things.  We have an eternal identity.

In today’s world it is wise to ask: how can I be exactly and precisely who God made me to be?  In this objective is health, stability, calm, contentment, quiet, patience, wisdom, morality, laughter, good judgement, ease, friendship, strength, loyalty, honor, love and salvation.

Ironically, in a culture that seeks to draw you in and under – the task is to stay afloat and aloft – above all the calamity, craziness, conflict and confusion.

Yes, the task at present: to live a monk’s life in mass culture, to take on independence and autonomy, gain humility and pleasure in all that God has given, all that God does, all that we have been made to be, all that God is.

Shalom.

If you find this helpful, please share it with others – friends, family members, neighbors and colleagues.

 We can all get better at living, gain peace, tranquility, stability and purpose – come to know joy as God provides it.

 

On the altar in my hermitage in France are images of Buddha and Jesus, and every time I light incense, I touch both of them as my spiritual ancestors … When you touch someone who authentically represents a tradition, you not only touch his or her tradition, you also touch your own. This quality is essential to dialogue.

Thich Nhat Hanh, in Living Buddha, Living Christ

+ + +

Tradition is profoundly important.  It is, as Thich says, essential to dialogue. Without tradition one cannot easily acquire the experience of another for traditions convey human experience, reality discovered over centuries, truth as to human beings and the supernatural.

In America, today, we have little constructive or civic dialogue between the Left and the rest of us.  Rather, we hear very harsh, hostile and angry language from the Left.  Their word and conduct decry this fact: those at war with others are at war with themselves.

War, you say.  Yes.

The Left feels betrayed.  They lost power and an election that felt sure they would win … one they and their candidate felt entitled to win.

Indeed, they feel rejected and cannot come to understand as they must, in these circumstances, that they must look within to ask: why is this so?  Why did so many others not favor them?

Yes, they have been betrayed.  But not by those who voted for their opponent – but rather by their ideology – an ideology which attacks tradition and faith that is its common witness.  In short, the Left has attacked and opposed tradition and religion.

As to ideology, it has no long human history.  It is a recent human construct, a fiction of intellect – not a vehicle of human and divine truth.  It is simply: a lie … and to live a lie is a personal betrayal, self-deception from which no authentic dialogue can arise.

In the West, the modern liberals and the Left have chosen intellect over faith, power over humility, what is false on its face from what is and has been sustained truth about humans and eternity.

If we are to have a civil society, the Left will have to see their errors and change their ways rather dramatically.  On our part, we must be present in kindness and calm to receive them when they desire to advance civil community once again.

Shalom.

Now the Lord said to Abram, “Go forth from your country … To the land that I will show you; and I will make of you a great nation … And in you all the families of the earth will be blessed.”

Gen 12: 1, 2, 3

+ + +

I sit in the morning fog in God’s green land.  Behind the mist are the pastures and the hills and mountains that I am sure to see when the veil is lifted and the sky is opened. I listen to De Profundis and Palestrina’s Gloria from Missa Papae Marcelli.

The news of the world is troubling.  In this land we wake to stories of overdoses, and of the murder of two young Muslim teenage boys on the eve of their high school graduation, both honor students on their way to college, and of conflicts and hostilities in Asia, the Middle East, Europe and Africa.  In our legislature the Party out of power acts like spoiled children, turns to obstruction while problems pile up and division disheartens.  Small groups act like angry pagans demanding this or that.  Racism surfaces among those once its victim.  The morning fog cannot hide the shame of this.

It had been four centuries without a prophet until Jesus emerged.  Four centuries.  Our Jewish brothers and sisters wondered why God was silent.  Then we received The Word, Immanuel – “God with us.”

We have been given the opportunity to become the children of God, to become the great nation that Abraham was called to bring forth.

Children of God and children of Abraham, but how do we act today?  We act as if there was no Abraham, no Jesus and there is no God.

Today we seek to create good through human acts but in place of good is conflict, discontent, selfishness, hatred.  The flesh and the will of man cannot triumph … it is God who perfects man, not man who prefects man.  Like Abraham we must be His vehicle, His instrument.

Like you I see the conflict, the needless hurt, the arrogance of man and woman, the reliance on self as if we are God.  We have credited ourselves with wisdom and power we do not have.

The good and wise man is humble, speaks softly – sees others as his family.

Are you the good and wise man?  Am I?

Shalom.

 

 

… in every society where the distinction of ranks has once been completely established, there have been always two different … systems of morality current at the same time; … one may be called the strict … the other the liberal, or … the loose system.  The former admired and revered by the common people, the latter … by … people of fashion.  (Emphasis added.)

Adam Smith, in The Wealth of Nations

+ + +

This is Smith writing in 1776.  His book had a huge impact.  Its date coincided with the founding of the United States.

What Smith said then is as useful now as it has been over the last 241 years. Smith knew people.  He knew power, and he knew politics.

What he said then is visible to us today.

We have groomed a collection of elites.  These are the privileged people – the super-rich and the very affluent.  We see them in national politics, among ex-Presidents, on the bench, in the media, in entertainment, among those newly wealthy in the computer and internet industry, within the highly-educated class and in the tenured positions at once prestigious colleges.

These are people who live well above the income level of the common person – their morals are not the morals of common people.  Regrettably their privileged lives convince them that they know better than the commoners and that this licenses them to enforce their morals (such as they are) on the rest of us … along with their public policies.

Ah, but their interests are not our interests.  They do not suffer when factory jobs disappear and when small towns no longer present a place to work and raise a family free of addictions, dependency and hopelessness.

This privileged class manifests less need for faith than the commoner.  Hence, their morals are unlike the commoner.  Surely not better, but rather uniquely destructive, divisive and unhealthy.

As Adams says so well, the morals of the privileged are ruinous …  and because they are wealthy, the elites can sustain years of disorder far longer than the commoner.

That said, when a nation loses its identity to illegal invaders, when abortion is a form of “birth control,” and the spread of terrorism takes the life of innocents, of children and unarmed men and women – the time for the loose morals and destructive policies and preferences of elites comes to an end.  THIS IS BRIXET AND THE HILLARY CLINTON AND DEMOCRATIC DEFEAT AT THE POLLS.  This is how one explains that the Democrats captured only 64 of the over 3000 counties in the U.S. in the last presidential election.

The heinous photo of a minor female “entertainer” holding the severed head of President Trump tells you three important things: one, the morals of the privileged are not the morals of the common person; two, the curve is bending back on the Liberals (the privileged class in both political parties) and their attitudes and disposition; and three, the relentless attacks on the President are the elites clutching at control, attempting to retain power at all costs … power over the common person.

Ah, but the times may well be changing.

Shalom.

Please note: the Post for May 30, 2017, will be added approximately noontime, U.S. East Coast time.

…Cain brought an offering to the Lord from the fruit of the soil, while Abel, for his part, brought one of the best firstlings from his flock.  The Lord looked with favor on Abel and his offering, but on Cain and his offering he did not.  Cain greatly resented this …

Cain said to his brother Abel, “Let us go out in the field.”  When they were in the field, Cain attacked his brother Abel and killed him.

Gen 4: 3, 4, 5, 8

+ + +

What are we to make of this story?  What might we learn?

God favored the younger Abel over his older brother, the firstborn of Adam and Eve. Cain is deeply resentful and murders his brother.  Might we carry something significant from this, something that would give us wisdom, teach us a fundamental truth about God, the world, human beings, you?

Universalism does not apply to God.  God gets to do what God wishes to do.  In faith we realize that there is a point being made, something significant to be learned and retained.

Here we realize, we do not govern God.  God gets to pick who and what is favored. We, like Cain, cause real problems when we impose our views on God, and rebel when our point of view, reasoning, expectations, desires are not met.

In God’s favoring of the younger son over the older, the story demonstrates that man’s law is not imposed on God or God’s law.

This brings me to “social justice” – a man-made vehicle to force all sorts of human claims on others.  And to “human rights” which is similarly used to disparage those who do not fit the view of this group or that.  In each instance, the proponents are Cain.  Arrogant, special pleaders – forcing views on others as if they are God.

Cain failed to force his view on God.  Might we learn something very useful from that?

I am constantly reminded that most of the liberal dialogue imposed on the public is rife with ignorance and that it does great damage … is unexamined, not put to the test.

Unabated, the liberals end as Cain – discontented with a world that does not bend to their desire, and killing others and creating conflict and division where it need not be.  Like Cain, they try to force their views on others and on God.  Disaster follows.

Shalom.

Postscript – Marxism, Marxist social theory, the Left, “progressives,” Communists, American liberals today force their views on others at all cost.  They are aggressive, arrogant, harsh, antagonistic, intolerant, conflicting, divisive, destructive and quite often wrong.  Does the Cain and Abel story inform us today?

Remarkable Reception for President Trump in Saudi Arabia.  The Saudis are to be applauded for the warmth and dignity they display.  This could be a significant turning point.  So much for the notion that President Trump is the Devil incarnate.

# # # 

… the state threatened to become not only militarily and politically triumphant but psychologically so: the custodial Superego for millions … their Egos an instrument, pure and simple, of the state’s bureaucratic manipulation.

Robert Coles, M.D. in A Secular Mind

+ + +

Dr. Coles, an esteemed research psychiatrist, is commenting on Nobel Laureate Czeslaw Milosz’s observations in his book entitled A Captive Mind in which he explores the consequences of (Communist) centralized state power over the individual person.

Doctor Coles ends his book about the secularized mind by focusing on the apparent need for the modern state to secure social and psychological control over its population.  And, Coles focuses on the prospects of neurochemistry and medical science in doing so.

As to the latter point, Coles draws on advances in neuroscience, biology and medicine – particularly on developments in pharmacology – reminding us that Sigmund Freud thought that in time the mind itself might be reduced to simple matter and ministered to (and perhaps altered substantially) by medications. That is to say, that the experience of being human would change rather significantly.

This, by the way, has been a theme expressed over time by a number of people from Orwell, to Huxley, to Stanislaw Witkiewicz and others, and displayed in Phillip Dick’s 1968 movie Blade Runner.

The notion of centralized control over the person leads me to think more critically of the divisions between those who despise Donald Trump and those who voted for him.

In thinking about this I see Trump as an unimportant focus.  It is not he himself that matters but rather the significance of the divide between those who voted for him and those who are clearly threatened by him, and seem to hate him.

It seems to me that the divide is what is important.

That said, I think one can make a reasonable observation that the difference is in part the distinction between those who favor centralized power and those who do not.  In effect, we are talking about those who favor government control over the social and psychological nature of the human person and those who oppose the same.

Illustratively, the Left favors imposing their “views” on others – i.e., forced “tolerance.” Some in the middle ground default to continued growth in government to the extent that sovereignty and national identity and nation itself is devolved to international organizations and competing cultures (i.e., globalists).

In opposition to this, of course, are those who favor less government and preservation of nation, individual freedom and continued American economic prosperity and ethos, and constitutional Federalism.

We have simply stated: globalists vs. nationalists.

So the question today is not Trump but what underpins the divide?  Why his adversaries violently oppose him?  Why the hatred and effort to drive him from office?

My view is that it has to do with a very fundamental question: Will we live in a country where control over the human person expands as the power of the central government and international organizations expands or will we not?

Shalom.

“To be or to try to be,” that is more the question.

Gerald May, M.D., in Simply Sane

+ + +

This seems like a very apt quote for the country and the world today.  Why do I say this?

Well, because there are ample signs of insanity, indeed more than I recall in my lifetime.  I cite only a few.  The exceptionally poor quality of discourse among politicians, academics and news people.  Likewise, the blood lust in the Middle East is cause for alarm, as is the presence of opiate addiction and the violent urban gangs in America, the assault on religious freedom and free speech, the disintegration of Europe, and the unwarranted attention given to transgenderism as if it were critical to national survival.

We seem to be untangling, becoming unglued.  Those who might lead seem lost, or hostile to America – intent on its undoing.  I think of the explosive national debt produced by our former President, or his reduction in our international role and in the strength and size of the military and the forced growth on the dependent class.  I think too of the Clinton corruption that goes unchecked, and the Left’s role in the rise of racial tension and its hatred of Whites, and the state surveillance of political foes.

Ample signs of insanity it seems to me.  People have abandoned being itself in favor of any feeble diversion they can latch on to.  By May’s standards: insanity – pure and simple.

We have, apparently, abandoned our individual responsibility to simply be …  to exist as human beings – to develop and mature.  In fact, I hardly encounter anyone in conversation among a range of friends and acquaintances who would not agree in whole or in part with what I say. What I see is seen by others.

Yes, there is a sense among many that we have become sick, are inclined to insanity as evidenced in a broad range to troubling conduct, public comment and oddball advocacy.

It seems to me that nothing short of insightful and wise discourse among the few who can be guides in a return to sanity and simple being will suffice at this moment in time.  Of course, when insanity becomes anarchy – perhaps more is needed.

For the Lord speaks, “Sons I have reared and brought up, But they have revolted against me.”

Isaiah 1:2

Shalom.

… fascism … is not a phenomenon of the right … it is, and always has been, a phenomenon of the left.  This fact … is obscured in our time by the equally mistaken belief that fascism and communism are opposites.  In reality they are closely related, historical competitors for the same constituents.  (Emphasis added.)

Jonah Goldberg, in Liberal Fascism

+ + +

If we ever needed a moment to put Goldberg’s observation in clear view, we got it yesterday with the details of the arrests of two immigrant young men (at least one who was scheduled to be deported) of a 14-year-old girl in a public high school in affluent, hyper-liberal, “politically correct” Montgomery County, Maryland, the murders committed by a Muslim radical a few paces from the British Parliament in London, and the news that candidate and President-elect Donald Trump and his staff were the subject of surveillance initiated during the last days of Barack Obama’s tenure as President and in concert with Mr. Obama’s curious expansion of the distribution of such information within the government.

Well, what exactly do we see in these three events that explain Mr. Goldberg’s point?

One, the “constituents” Mr. Goldberg refers to are those who seek a totalitarian state which will control its citizens from cradle to grave and, in this, eliminate freedom as we have known it in the United States.

Two, the quest for centralized state control is the unifying theme of those on the Left: the Democrat Party, the “progressives” and Marxists in the U.S. and in the West, and the radical Muslims in the Middle East.

Three, in our present state here and in the West, we see that the Fascist Left seeks to destroy the freedom upon which America and the West has flourished.

Four, the Left, indeed, is at war with America and Western Civilization and wishes to destroy its foundational institutions: family, faith, gender, sexual mores, racial harmony, law and police authority, morality, Constitutional protections afforded a free people, the American genius of sovereign states in a Representative Democracy of three equal branches of federal government and governed by free elections, free market economics, honest and open intellectual inquiry and an independent and free press and media.

Five, to explain why it is that Democrats and Leftist desire the eradication of national borders and the staunch opposition to vetting prospective immigrants to this country is quite simple: this is the Left’s way of waging combat against this Nation.  Yes, dangerous immigrants and immigration at-large are designed to eliminate America as it once existed.  Yes, the export of jobs and industry and open access to America’s national security secrets and wealth (a special thanks are due the Clintons, the old line elites, and Mr. Obama) are much like Mr. Obama’s crushing deficit spending – namely a way the self-loathing Left seeks to destroy our country.  Ditto, the grotesque expansion of the dependent class now reduced to serfdom, government-induced enslavement.

Look Folks, this is where we are.  This is where England and our European allies are.  This is where the (once) Free World is.  We have met the enemy and they are closer than you think.  But, alas, the dialogue has not been joined.  We have not explained what we now have as a life-altering circumstance, and a threat to this Nation and the West.

Shalom.

For years … we have been sinking … into a thoroughly modern chaosa scholarly and documented chaos, worthy of our Liberal and Progressive thinkers.  For years our universities of Europe and America have been hacking away at the twin foundations of their own house.  Like men gone mad with pride they have recklessly attacked Christianity and Hellenism as though they could by some legerdemain preserve Western civilization and still destroy the two great traditions on which it rests. (Emphasis added.)

 Robert J. Gannon, Address (Fordham University, 1941)

+ + +

Friends, disaster rises slowly as it builds.  It does, however, not creep up on us. Decades ago, Gannon and others saw the unraveling of the West – the indigenous attacks on Christianity and democracy (Hellenism).

The above quote tells us where we are today.  Our Liberal and “Progressive” (read, Marxist) wizards and their well-tutored underlings (in law, politics, the media, the press, and academia) along with an endless list of a sundry special pleaders advancing one after another of socially destructive – even suicidal – propositions have spread chaos and division.

Yes, the Liberal and Marxists have fragmented and weakened us – displacing wisdom and common sense with nonsense and misguided images of a man-made utopia here on earth.

Make no mistake, we face a broad frontal and foundational assault.  This is the root of the existential danger we face.

It follows that first we must debunk the errant Leftist, godless notions of life in democracy.

We must, in contrast, raise up the genius of our Founders and their unique, and invaluable appreciation for the nature of the human being and the delicate structure of a Constitution that guarantees stability through a Federal system that protects civil society and the freedom of its citizens and private interests by insuring a two tiered system of governmental authority shared by the national government and its sovereign states.

Mind you, by the way, the system of freedom and self-governing we enjoy reserves a privileged place for religious freedom and rests on the essence of Judeo-Christian wisdom.

In Gannon and others you have been adequately forewarned.  Wake up.  Stand up.  Prevail. This, by the way, is the essence of Brexit and the Trump victory. Build on this … before it is too late.

In our age, as never before, truth implies the courage to face chaos.

Erich Neumann, in Man and Time

Shalom.

Welcome Message

Categories

Log In

%d bloggers like this: