You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘God’s Economy’ category.

The liberal left can be as rigid and destructive as any force in American life.

Daniel Patrick Moynihan

+ + +

Pat Moynihan was a good and honest man.  Grew up in Hell’s Kitchen.  Became a Harvard prof.  A Democrat.  An intellectual.  A public servant.  A man who loved his country and maintained an informed and honest conversation with all members of the political community and the public at large.

He was a man without malice, an open-minded man who let the evidence lead him to conclusions.  He was neither an ideologue nor a rigid partisan.  He was a public servant – an honest man.  In his day, this country and its people came before political party.

Today’s Democrat Party is not Pat Moynihan’s Party.  Likewise, he would not recognize the present U.S. Department of Justice or the F.B.I. as places of honor and honesty and he would speak about its failure and, with urgency, seek to correct its shameful ways.

We are in a bad way today.  We are losing the legacy of a loyal and fair opposition – the Democrat Party.   They no longer maintain an interest in governing in the Congress.  They simply “resist.”  In this failure to legislate, the process which connects each of us to the liberty embodied in the U.S. Constitution, injuries each of us and makes a sham of election to the Congress.

As a political entity the Democrats now lean to socialism and further Left even.  Its views and actions resonate as nihilism; in voice and deed they show contempt for our Republic, the Nation itself, law and our Constitution.  They have become a party of unequal justice, disdain for the common citizen, and hatred of those with whom they disagree.  Sadly, the lawlessness of their members, sympathizers, friends and associates are often excused.

This is not Pat Moynihan’s Democrat Party – and we are far the lesser for it.

The Lord is my light and my salvation; whom shall I fear?  The Lord is the defense of my life.  Whom shall I dread?

Our salvation, and the preservation of this Nation, will rest on our relationship with God – the source of our sovereignty and our salvation.

Shalom.

Good Men – The Democrat Party I knew once had great, good men in it.  Men like Tip O’Neill (U.S. Congressman and Speaker of the House) and Barefoot Sanders (a Federal Judge and former U.S. Senate candidate from Texas).  Each was a fine person, honest and fair.  Each enjoyed people – valued them.  The Democrat Party is a long way from these men of character.  Wish it was not so.

Advertisements

People deal too much with the negative, with what is wrong.  Why not try and see positive things, to just touch those things and make them bloom?

Thich Nhat Hanh

+ + +

Our Zen Buddhist friend makes a very good point.  One that the Leftist today would be wise to learn and apply.

Think about it – a steady drum beat of negativity is hard to endue.  Life is not all bad or all good.  Life is life – somethings are problematic, others are not.  Problems arise along side pleasures.  That is life’s baseline: problems and pleasures.  Doomsday complaints are overstated.

Constant complaining misses the good that is always present.  The wise see both what is good and what is problematic.  Their words are temperate, not extreme.  Constant complaints distort reality, create a pall over all things and can show illness or hostile intent.

Pure instinct alone ought to tell us that those who constantly complain have lost their way.  The good is always present.  Dark clouds do not banish the sun.  The glass is always (on average) half full – not empty or broken.

One cannot long survive with those who are always negative.  Negativity becomes a habit.  It is the enemy of reality, contentment and peace.  Maintain a negative outlook long enough and one does not see the good, solutions to problems as they arise.  Digging a ditch one loses the horizon – and there is always a horizon.

Be positive and be around positive people – those with hope and a lively upbeat nature.  Be someone with hope to bring and offer that to others in your mere presence, and in your way of seeing and experiencing the world – in all its twists and turns.

Shalom.

Hysteria – Lots of hysteria in the air in Washington, D.C. but little concern that (according to news reports) Ms. Clinton made available to others (including other countries, adversaries) President Obama’s daily intelligence briefing by NOT having and using a secure computer system.  Not good.

Negativity can lead to hysteria and partisanship and cause people to lose sight of very significant problems.  Negativity breeds a distorted view of life, folds people in on themselves, and can breed hostility and persecution.  Not good.

Trust the Lord and do good.  Live in the land and feed on truth.

Ps. 37:3

+ + +

In faith we are discreet listeners.  The faithful discern who trusts in the Lord and who does not.

Does the celebrity show their trust in the Lord?  The Socialist?  The news man or news women?   The cable TV talking head?  The college professor?  The person writing the Op-Ed piece or the member of the newspaper editorial board?  The high school teacher?  The famous athlete?  The politician?

Those who constantly complain have no time to listen – they show their godlessness by their constant discontent and their propensity for division and disorder.

Who among the many voices you hear daily trusts in the Lord, and who does good?

And you, do you feed on truthDo you feed on truth and in doing so turn a deft ear to those who do not?

Truth is a narrow gate.  We pass through the gate one person at a time.

The chorus of voices all chanting the same thing – could they all speak truth in unison?  If so, we would know we are in heaven.  We are not in heaven here, today, at this moment.

Our Founding Fathers created a Republic where faith is united with liberty.  There are many among us who wish that were not so.  They are ones thirsting for power over others.  They prefer their way to God’s Truth.  They prefer themselves to others, especially those who are faithful.

Each is called to feed on truth.  That is the call of a personal God who desires intimate friendship with you, His beloved.

Ignore the chattering herd.  It is God who speaks Truth and seeks your well-being and union with you.  Leave the perpetually discontented to their discontent – soon enough they will feed on one another and come to pass.

Shalom.

Foreign Policy and Elites – One of the reasons Trump is under attack from the elites and their minions in the media is this: for decades foreign policy and intelligence service was considered the exclusive frontier of elites like Christian Herder, the Anglophone Dean Acheson (who chose the immodest title Present at the Creation for his memoir on his service as Secretary of State).  Indeed, when the CIA was begun Catholics were not recruited (even though “Wild Bill” Donovan was the first Director) in favor of Protestants from the Ivies with wealthy family backgrounds.  Trump is, plainly stated, “not to the manor born.”  Neither are the rest of us.  Democracy is not Plutocracy.  This the elites and media wannabes sternly find objectionable.  They prefer to be “special” despite ample proof to the contrary.

 

The purpose of life … is to be helpful, to be compassionate, to have it make some difference that you lived and lived well.

Ralph Waldo Emerson

+ + +

A satisfying life does not require you paint on a large canvas.  A small canvas will do.

I tell you a story.  In my early years I was raised in my grandparents home with my mother (their oldest child and only girl).   My mother helped her mother raise four boys – her brothers: Ernie, Ray, Don and Bob.  They were my Uncles.  I was the peanut among them.  I looked up to them – as I grew they became my friends.  I had an especially close relationship with Don and Ray and their wives.

When my wife suffered from cancer, they watched over me.  When she died, they watched over me.  When my mother died, they watched over me and stood vigil with my young son who missed his Granny greatly.  Both Don and Ray lived the right way – tended to their wives and children, lived honorably, helped others, loved and laughed heartily.

Years after my wife’s death, Ray’s wife contracted a rare illness, one that was most likely to take her life.  I was Ray’s confidant.  He was bewildered by what he faced.  I told him she needed the best Doctor who knew the most about this illness and that I would find that person and I did.  My Aunt Tippy got the best care possible.

I stood with Ray when she passed, and with Don when his lovely wife Ginny passed.  Both good men showed their courage and their loss.  My heroes were wounded as I had been.

Years latter, both Don and Ray developed illness that would take their life.  Each talked often to me during their illness – wonderful conversations, honest, touching, urgent but assuring – privileged.  I spent hours on the phone with Don the day before he died – precious time – beautiful, irreplaceable – unforgettable time.

In my travails and hardships and modest successes I became their “go to guy.”  My losses and struggles and experiences were their fortress in times of strife.  A small boy had become a trusted source, their counsel, guide, confessor.  I was honored by men I looked up to and loved … I can hardly think about it without getting emotional.

When Ray neared death he told me this, “Bobby, I never considered you my nephew – I thought of you as my youngest brother.”  Few things have honored me so.

You do not need a large canvas, a small one will do.  Take your licks in this world – everyone faces difficulty.  Forget fame or fortune – focus on growing in understanding, wisdom, common sense, faith – be helpful – make a difference where and when it matters most to others.  Life is good.

May you be blessed to experience what I have related here.  You have a reason for being.

Shalom.

 

 

Jesus said … “Did I not say that if you believe, you will see the glory of God.”

Jn 11:39

+ + +

Here Jesus speaks to Martha, the sister of Lazarus, after Lazarus has died and been laid to rest in his tomb.

You see those who assembled around Martha and her sister Mary questioned why Jesus (who had opened the eyes of the blind man) did not keep their friend Lazarus from death.

We live in a period where “unbelief” is widespread and where, absent believe, individuals and groups attempt to secure their ends sans faith and God.

In a milder form this was the sentiment of those who doubted Jesus was the Messiah … and began to question His identity at Lazarus’ death.  These people favored their desired outcome, and doubted Jesus.  We do precisely this today.  We are of little faith.  We “go it alone” and seek our fractured ends.  Godless we create a mess, elevate ourselves to heights of foolishness and descend to the depths of chaos, uncertainty, hostility, destruction, dishonesty and folly.  Without belief – we destroy the gifts we have been given.  Shame on us.

We had best learn the lesson of Lazarus’ death.  Living in doubt of God – we have done great damage.  Shame on us.

Stay strong in faith.  Turn from those who, not believing, destroy.

Shalom.

Yesterday’s Congressional Hearing – Witness Peter Strzok of the FBI and the howling Members of the Congress in the minority party showed what godlessness looks like – what life without belief sounds like.  Poor Mr. Strzok – smug, self-righteous.  Members of the minority – chaotic, even childish.  Net: dignity absent – humility, maturity and belief in short supply. 

The transformation of charity into legal entitlement has produced both donors without love and recipients without gratitude.

Antonin Scalia

+ + +

These words are from an address given by former Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia at the Pontifical Gregorian University in Rome in 1996.

Among his observations are these:

  • “a Christian should not support a government that suppresses faith or one that sanctions the taking of innocent life”
  • he knows of “no country in which the churches have grown fuller as the government has moved leftward”
  • the most religious nation in the West (the U.S.) is a capitalist society that is “least diluted by socialism”  (Emphasis added.)
  • since FDR’s New Deal, the U.S. has taken on the increasing role of a welfare state (i.e., taking tax proceeds of all and dispensing them to select individuals and groups that are deemed “needy” – and building political constituents in the process)
  • “Christ’s view was that you should give your goods to the poor, not that you should force someone else to give his (to others)”  (Emphasis added.)
  • “to the extent that the states takes upon itself one of the corporal works of mercy that would have been undertaken privately, it deprives individuals of an opportunity for sanctification and deprives the body of Christ of the occasion for interchange of love among its members”
  • the welfare-state does not contain or convey the Christian virtue of altruism
  • “governmentalization of charity effects … the donor but also the recipient … What was once asked as a favor is now demanded as an entitlement … the teaching of welfare socialism is that the world owes everyone a living.”

What Scalia lays out is the decline of the role of faith in secular culture – and with it the loss of moral conduct long displayed by acts of religiously inspired service.

Likewise socialism fundamentally changes the way humans experience themselves, others and the nature of fellowship and community – indeed it blunts the power of love and hope … it deprives us of faith and sanctification.

Make no mistake, religion and God have been shunned in the post-New Deal environment – and, frankly, when moral conduct is not fostered through a population who has an active faith – hostility and faithless division takes its place.  There we become a troubled and self-destructive culture with less opportunity to make of us brothers and sisters to one another.

Converting to socialism and BIG government is, quite simply, destructive.

Shalom.

It is very well to insist that man is a “social animal” – the fact is obvious enough.  But there is no justification for making him a mere cog in a totalitarian machine –  

In actual fact, society depends for its existence on the inviolable personal solitude of its members.  Society, to merit its name, must be made up not of numbers, or mechanical units, but of persons.  To be a person implies responsibility and freedom, and both of these imply a certain interior solitude, a sense of personal integrity  … (Emphasis added.)

Thomas Merton, in Thoughts in Solitude

+ + +

Well, we are about to have a real brou-ha-ha over the appointment of a new Justice to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The President has nominated a person whose view seems to be that the U.S. Constitution, as written, must be honored – that it is not a judge’s job to “make” new law but rather honor the plain meaning of the Constitution as written.

This view is opposed by the Left. They prefer (and have become accustomed to) winning political objectives through law suits and Court action when they cannot secure these objectives through the legislature or through the political (electoral) process.

This brings us to Merton.

He notes that we have arrived at a point in time whereby the individual can be made into a “cog in a totalitarian machine.”  Indeed, this is the risk one runs when a group desires that their views and preferences be imposed on others, especially in areas that are deeply personal and about which reasonable people can differ.

The point Merton makes is that society is composed of free people who take individual responsibility for their own life.

This is the underpinning of our rights and protections in our Constitution.  This is the root of a free representative Republic.  This is the articulated view of the current nominee to the Supreme Court.  His emphasis is on protecting the sanctity of the individual and the Constitution.  In a very real sense that is the underlying dispute between Conservatives, moderates and “neutralists,” and the Left today.

One sees in the opposition to this nominee and his way of seeing and understanding the Left is worried.  Their concern is that his way of thinking will result in the abandoned of their preferences in matters of social policy secured through Judicial activism.

I do not know how this will sort itself out – but I do know that (for me) I am tired of waking up every day to the non-stop yelling and screaming, hyperbolic assertions of the Left and the endless “demonstrations” that manufacture and perpetuate discord.  Likewise, I do not see the judicial system as a means to create social (or public) policy – a task resting with the Legisature.

I prefer quieter times, a Court that protects the Constitution, and the baseline expectation that each free person will be individually responsibility for their own life.

I favor the sacred person to a “cog.”  I find the former is a more satisfying and liberating state of being than the latter.

Shalom.

 

 

All sins are attempts to fill voids.

Simone Weil

+ + +

Life isn’t hard if you just listen to people who are smart and leave us some valuable guideposts.  Of course as people – we tend to charge ahead hitting objects head-first without a helmet.

And, then – there are things that find us – hardships, inconveniences, bad deeds and thoughtless things done by others others.  These produce the occasion to sin – to react harshly and “get even.”  But the greatest frontier as to sin – is us, each of us.

We are sinners.  Every one of us.  (That’s why God and mercy are so necessary to our existence, our over-arching story.)

Think about this: when you sin, ask yourself what void has this sinful act uncovered in me? 

Many of the sins we see are “deficits” we experience related to the want of intimacy, or power, or status, or identity, or a place in the group or the world.  Once you discover this, sin can be defused – and then, all the more, when you realize God is vital to your full grow and development – your contentment, peace and relationship with others comes into full form.

The more sin is defuse – the more others become your brothers and sisters.  That joy awaits you.  God speed.

Shalom.

 

… the Lord spoke to me, the Spirit entered into me and set me on my feet …

Ez 2:2

+ + +

In this Old Testament verse, the Prophet Ezekiel records how he was moved to assume responsibility to go to the Israelites who had consistently rebelled against their God.

Think about Ezekiel.  He was a faithful man and in his relationship with God he was moved to address the waywardness of his fellow Jews.  In this he accepted a difficult course – that of a Prophet.  He was willing to speak God’s truth to those who had strayed from that truth – from their God.

Is there not always a place for Prophets?

Are we ourselves not often in rebellion as to God?  Do we not prefer our desires to God’s intention for us?  Do we not place politics above faith?  Ideology above belief?  Are we not today the Israelies of yesterday?

Are we, as Believers, not called as Ezekiel was called?  If not you, then who?  Who might speak God’s truth to those who demonstrate they rebell and corrupt what is good?  Is our silence ever justified in such circumstances?  What if Eekiel remained silent?

Someone must speak God’s truth.  Today requires more than one voice speaking God’s truth.  A Nation of professed belief in God requires the voices of those who believe.

Shalom.

the righteous mind is like a tongue with six taster receptors.  Secular Western moralities are like cuisines that try to activate just one or two of these receptors – either concerns about harm and suffering, or concerns about fairness and injustice.  But people have so many powerful moral intuitions, such as those related to liberty, loyalty, authority, and sanctity.  (Emphasis added.)

Jonathan Haidt, Ph.D., in The Righteous Mind

+ + +

Well if you want to understand the basic rift between the Left and others (moderates, Conservatives, and “neutralists”)?  Haidt gives you that understanding.

The Left is secularized – removed from faith, anchored in material existence, the narrows of intellect and ideology devoid of psychological or spiritual depth and the understanding and experience that each provides.

In matters public and political they are so narrowly focused, they neglect or dismiss our natural desire for liberty, loyalty, authority and sanctity (as Haidt notes).

You see, esteemed Social Psychologist Haidt is telling us that as a matter of innate design the human person thirsts for morality that attends to more than fairness and equality.  Mind you, this thirst is an involuntary desire.  Hence, we are “hardwired” for a morality that extends beyond the shallows of the Left.

The distinction that Haidt describes explains why the Left is intolerant and must force their views on others much as totalitarians do.

Ironically, on an even playing field (i.e., one not corrupted to protect their views) the Left is destined to fail because the public’s natural moral appetite is larger than what they offer.  Humans are more complex than the Left reckons.  No, we are not all like them or their ideology.

Think about the many positions the Left advances or defends and you realize that their positions are at odds with the innate moral desires of the human person at-large.

Once that thinking is done, you can see how the Left forestalls the full development of the human person.  Indeed, they create unnecessary conflict (and division) by attempting to impose exceedingly narrow views on others that are, as a consequence, antagonistic to our broader moral needs.

Haidt, applied to our present situation, leads to greater understanding of the unhealthy antagonism that the Left generates.

You would be wise to get to know Haidt and his excellent scholarly work.

Shalom.

 

Welcome Message

Categories

Log In

Advertisements
%d bloggers like this: